• Lazear, E. P. (1999). Economic Imperialism. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution and Graduate School of Business. Stanford University.
  • Davis, J. B. (2015). Economic imperialism versus multidisciplinarity. STOREP Conference: Proceedings. Retrieved from www.johnbryandavis.net/uploads/2/2/7/3/22734340/econ_imperialism.pdf
  • Sapir, Zh. (2003). Imperializm ekonomicheskoy nauki [Imperialism of economic science]. Zhurnal'nyj zal – A journal room. Retrieved from www.magazines.russ.ru/nz/2003/2/sa.html [in Russian].
  • Yeshchenko, P. S. (2014). Svitova kryza i kryza ekonomichnoi teorii: spivvidnoshennya i vzaiemodiya [The global crisis and the crisis of economic theory: the relationship and interaction]. Ekonomichna teoriya – Economic theory, 3, 24–37. [in Ukrainian].
  • Rodionova, L. (2014). Napryamy rozvytku ekonomichnoi teorii na pochatku 20 st. [Directions of development of an economic theory at the beginning of the XXI century]. Visnyk TNEU – TNEU Herald, 2, 159–170. [in Ukrainian].
  • Bolotina, Ye. (2013). Bahatofaktorna model ekonomichnoi povedinky [Multifactors model of economic behavior]. Halytskyi ekonomichnyi visnyk – Galician Economic Herald, 2(41), 5–10. [in Ukrainian].
  • Kolot, A. M. (2014). Mizhdystsyplinarnyi pidkhid yak peredumova rozvytku ekonomichnoi nauky ta osvity [Interdisciplinary approach as a precondition for the development of economic science and education]. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, Ekonomika – Herald of Kyiv National Shevchenko University, Economics, 5 (158), 18–22. [in Ukrainian].
  • Kryvyi, V. I. (2016). Peredumovy vynyknennya povedinkovoi ekonomiky [Preconditions for nascency of a behavioral economy]. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu – Scientifi c Herald of Kherson State University, 18(1), 12–16. [in Ukrainian].
  • Nesenenko, P. P., Artemenko, O. A., & Patlatoy, O. Ye. (2017). Suchasni ekonomichni teorii [Modern economic theories]. Odessa: ONEU. [in Ukrainian].
  • Nazarov, I. V. (2011). Perspektyvy rozvytku ekonomichnoi teorii: konflikt khrystyyanskoi ta humanistychnoi paradyhmy u svitli idei «filosofi i hospodarstva» S. M. Bulhakova [Prospects for the development of economic theory: the confl ict of the Christian and humanistic paradigm in the light of the ideas of the «philosophy of the economy» S. M. Bulgakov]. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka, Ekonomika – Herald of Kyiv National Shevchenko University, Economics, 131, 16–19. [in Ukrainian].
  • Meyzhys, I., & Pochebut, L. (2006). Indyvidualizm chy kolektyvizm? Sotsialno-psykholohichnyi pohlyad na istoriyu i politychnu kulturu Ukrainy [Individualism or collectivism? Socio-psychological view on the history and political culture of Ukraine]. Sotsialna psykholohiya – Social Psychology, 6, 47–59. [in Ukrainian].
  • Postautichnaya ekonomika i ee vragi [Postautistic economy and its enemies]. (n. d.) Retrieved from http://polite.com.ua/library/4001-/html [in Russian].
  • Orekhov, A. M. (2006). Metody ekonomicheskikh issledovaniy [Methods of economic research: a tutorial]. Moscow: INFRA-M [in Russian].
  • Doklad o mirovom razvitii «Myshleniye. Obshchestvo i povedeniye» (2015). [World Development Report «Thinking, Society and Behavior»]. World Bank Group. Retrieved from http://documents.vsemirnyjbank.org/curated/ru/469141468128391061/pdf/928630WDR0v20O00Box385381B00PUBLIC0.pdf
  • Bekker, G. S. (2003). Chelovecheskoe povedeniye: ekonomicheskiy podkhod [Human behavior: the economic approach]. Izbrannyie trudy po ekonomicheskoi teorii – Selected works on economic theory, 672. Moscow. [in Russian].
  • Furkad, M., Olon, E., & Algan, Ya. (2015). Prevoskhodstvo ekonomistov [Dominance of economists]. Voprosy ekonomiki – Economic issues, 7, 45–72. [in Russian].