Journal
УКР   ENG
Socio-Economic Problems
of the Modern Period of Ukraine
   



Collection SEPSPU -- sep2018.06.029

Repository of Institute of Regional Research Repository of Vernadsky Library UDC 631.15:005.59; JEL Q01, O13
Dorofyeyev, O. (2018). Harmonizatsiya yak pryntsyp transformatsiyi upravlinnya [Harmonization as a principle of management transformation]. In Sotsial'no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 134 (6) (pp. 29-34). Retrieved from http://ird.gov.ua/sep/doi/sep2018.06.034. [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 20

Authors



Dorofyeyev Oleksandr Viktorovych

Ph.D. of Economics, Associate Professor

Professor of the Department of management of the Poltava State Agrarian Academy

Contacts: olexandr.dorofeev@pdaa.edu.ua

Webpages:

Resume

The crisis of modern management paradigm of development in agrarian economy sector shows itself in the inability of society to traditionally solve new tasks faced by economic system, which is bounded by biosphere scales. It is in the first place about the establishment and compliance with certain parameters of agricultural enterprises’ economic activity, in particular removal of resources used for production of goods and their reproduction; distribution of social branch product and distribution of property, etc. Results of the research presented in the article confirm the existence of the crisis of anthropocentric paradigm of social development, which requires revision of the methodology of complex systems management. Unfortunately, the emergence of new concepts for managing the development of agricultural sector of the economy ("sustainable development", "balanced development") showed the weakness of their theoretical and methodological basis, which conditioned the continuation of scientific research in the direction of forming a more adequate management paradigm. The research, the subject matter of which is the management of certain sectors of the economy harmonious development, in particular, agrarian ones, are prospective within this context. Even initial scientific investigations in this direction indicate the existence of a complex of problems of the agrarian sphere development, associated with the harmonious proportions violation of system structures. The hypothesis, that bringing the parameters of structural elements to harmonious proportions can give impetus to the development of the agrarian economics system, is formulated. The research confirms the crisis of anthropocentric paradigm of social development that requires the review of the methodology of complicated systems’ management. New management concepts of agrarian sector development («sustainable development», «stable development», «balanced development»), unfortunately, show the weakness of their theoretical and methodological background that causes the ongoing scientific research concerning the most adequate management paradigm. The author proves that the new proportions under structural and functional changes either correspond to the law of golden-section search that means harmonious (progressive) development, or deviate from this organization rate considerably, causing regression.

Keywords:

development, agricultural sector of the economy, harmonious development management, harmonious proportions, management system

References

    
  1. Hicks, J. (2003). Teoriya ekonomicheskoy istorii [Theory of conomic history]. Moscow: NP «Journal of Economic Issues». [in Russian].
  2. Kryuchkova, I. V. (2005, Nov 23). Makrostrukturni faktory rozvytku ekonomiky Ukrayiny ta Zakon zolotoho pererizu [Macrostructural factors of economic development of Ukraine and the Law of golden section]. Institute for Evolutionary Economics: Website. [in Ukrainian].
  3. Oskolskyy, V. (2011). Ratsional’ne pryrodokorystuvannya – vazhlyva umova noosfernoho rozvytku Ukrayiny [Rational nature management is an important condition for noospheric development in Ukraine]. Ekonomika Ukrayiny – Economy of Ukraine, 11, 4-13. [in Ukrainian].
  4. Shubravska, O. (2012). Innovatsiynyy rozvytok ahrarnoho sektora ekonomiky Ukrayiny: teoretyko-metodolohichnyy aspekt [Innovative development of the agrarian sector of Ukraine’s economy: theoretical and methodological aspect]. Ekonomika Ukrayiny – Economy of Ukraine, 1, 27-35. [in Ukrainian].
  5. Pustovoyt, O. V. (2012). Systemna nestiykist’ i al’ternatyvy rozvytku Ukrayins’koyi ekonomiky [System instability and alternatives to the development of the Ukrainian economy]. Ekonomika Ukrayiny – Economy of Ukraine, 8, 32-43. [in Ukrainian].
  6. Solovyova, N. (2010). Formuvannya systemy derzhavnoho planuvannya rozvytku sil’s’koho hospodarstva Ukrayiny [Formation of the system of state planning of agricultural development in Ukraine]. Ekonomika Ukrayiny – Economy of Ukraine, 8, 11-20. [in Ukrainian].
  7. Diyal’nist’ sub”yektiv hospodaryuvannya: statystychnyy zbirnyk za 2017 r. [Activity of economic entities: statistical yearbook for 2017] (2018). State Statistics Service of Ukraine: Website. [in Ukrainian].
  8. Paskhaver, B. Y., Moldovan, L. V., & Shubravska, O. V. (2012). Osnovni problemy rozvytku sil’s’kohospodars’koho vyrobnytstva [Major problems of development of agricultural production]. Ekonomika APK – Economy AIC, 9, 3-9. [in Ukrainian].
  9. Nersesyants, V. S. (2003). Filosofiya prava [Philosophy of law]: Tutorial. Moscow: NORMA. [in Russian].
  10. Ivanus, A. I. (2011). Garmonichnyy innovatsionnyy menedzhment [Harmonious innovation management]. Moscow: Book House «LIBROKOM». [in Russian].
  11. Prangishvili, I. V., & Ivanus, A. I. (2004). Sistemnaya zakonomernost’ zolotogo secheniya, sistemnaya ustoychivost’ i garmoniya [Systemic regularity of the golden section, systemic stability and harmony]. Problemy upravleniya – Management problems, 2, 2-8. [in Russian].
  12. Gritsenko, A. A. (Ed.) (2008). Institutsional’naya arkhitektonika i dinamika ekonomicheskikh preobrazovaniy [Institutional architectonics and dynamics of economic transformations]. Kharkiv: Fort. [in Russian].
  13. Soroko, E. M. (2012). Zolotyye secheniya, protsessy samoorganizatsii i evolyutsii sistem: Vvedeniye v obshchuyu teoriyu garmonii sistem [Golden sections, processes of self-organization and system evolution: Introduction to the general theory of harmony of systems]. Ed. 4th. Moscow: Librocom. [in Russian].
  14. Akimova, T. A., & Moseykin, Yu. N. (2009). Ekonomika ustoychivogo razvitiya [Economics of sustainable development]: Tutorial. Moscow: Economics. [in Russian].
  15. Garmonichnoye razvitiye sistem – tretiy put’ chelovechestva [«Harmonious development of systems – the third way of mankind»]: Resolution of the congress (2011). Odessa, 2011, October 8-10. Retrieved from http://instituteofcreativetechnologies.com/congress [in Russian].
  16. Dorofyeyev, O. V. (2012). Teoretyko-metodolohichni osnovy formuvannya paradyhmy upravlinnya harmoniynym rozvytkom ahrarnoho sektoru ekonomiky [Theoretical and methodological foundations of the formation of a paradigm of management of harmonious development of the agrarian sector of the economy]. In Naukovi pratsi Poltavs’koyi derzhavnoyi ahrarnoyi akademiyi: Ekonomichni nauky [Proceedings of Poltava State Agrarian Academy: Economics]: Vol. 3(1) (pp. 39-44). [in Ukrainian].
  17. Yegorova-Gudkova, T. I. (2011). Proyektirovaniye ustoychivoy ekonomicheskoy sistemy gosudarstva na osnove modeli zolotogo secheniya [Designing a sustainable economic system of the state based on the model of the golden section] In Garmonichnoye razvitiye system – tretiy put’ chelovechestva [Harmonious development of systems – the third way of humanity] (pp. 333-336). Odessa: Institute of creative technologies. [in Russian].
  18. Deyaki pytannya udoskonalennya upravlinnya v sferi vykorystannya ta okhorony zemel’ sil’s’kohospodars’koho pryznachennya derzhavnoyi vlasnosti ta rozporyadzhennya nymy [Some issues of improvement of management in the field of use and protection of agricultural land of state ownership and disposal by them] (2017). Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, adopted on 2017, Jun 7, 413. Legislation of Ukraine: Website. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/413-2017-п [in Ukrainian].
  19. Za 25 rokiv poholiv”ya VRKH v Ukrayini skorotylos’ u 6,4 razy [For 25 years, the cattle population in Ukraine has decreased by 6.4 times]. (2015, May 13). Association of milk producers: Website. Retrieved from http://avm-ua.org/uk/post/za-25-rokiv-pogoliva-vrh-v-ukraini-skorotilos-u-64-razi?milkua=1 [in Ukrainian].
  20. Kil’kist’ sil’s’kohospodars’kykh tvaryn na 1 lyutoho 2019 roku [Number of farm animals as of February 1, 2019] (2019). State Statistics Service of Ukraine: Website. [in Ukrainian].


Web-master P. Popadyuk