UDC 336.1; JEL I38, M14, Z10
Voznyak, H., & Zherebylo, I. (2019). Osoblyvosti funktsionuvannya ta problemy rozvytku sfery kul'tury ta mystetstva v umovakh reformy publichnykh finansiv [Features of functioning and problems of development of sphere of culture and art in the conditions of reform of public finances]. In Sotsial'no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 140 (6) (pp. 26-32). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/2071-4653-2019-6-5. [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 12

Authors



Voznyak Halyna Vasylivna

Doctor of Economics, Senior Researcher

Leading Researcher of the Department of regional financial policy of the Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine

Contacts: gvoznyak@gmail.com

Webpages:

Zherebylo Iryna Vladyslavivna

Ph.D. of Philosophy, Associate Professor

Director of the Lviv Institute of the University of Banking

Contacts: zherebіlo@gmail.com, referent@libs.ubs.edu.ua

Webpages:

Resume

Culture as a means of consolidation of the nation and a method of forming the world outlook in the current conditions of development of Ukrainian society, unfortunately, does not correspond to the socio-political changes in the country and world development trends due to a number of different circumstances. Therefore, it needs some modernization and reform. The purpose of the article is to analyze the specifics of functioning and to identify problems of development of the field of culture and art as well as to outline directions of their solution. The results of the study of the functioning of culture and art sphere are presented. The problems of this industry development over the last ten years are identified. Among the most important are the following: reduction of the role of culture and art in people’s lives; low level of budget support; moral aging of the material and technical base of cultural institutions; inefficient management of cultural institutions; low material remuneration of cultural workers and low social prestige of their work. The peculiarities of functioning of the sphere of culture and art are revealed. The peculiarities of the industry are revealed as following: some institutions are focused both on cultural services and on the development of culture and human beings (creation of conditions for creativity); institutions perform the state function of creating, preserving, collecting and studying the cultural heritage of funds and works of art, although this function is not directly related to the specific consumer; it is difficult to unambiguously measure the end results of cultural and artistic activity, which are expressed mainly in the delayed social effect and are manifested in the increase of intellectual potential, changes in values and norms of human behavior, etc. Emphasis is placed on the challenges of further development caused by the ongoing reforms. The directions of solving the problems are outlined regarding the improvement of regulatory support and mechanisms for attracting additional financial resources, etc.

Keywords:

culture, art, public finance, decentralization, financing

References


1. Voznyak, H. V. (2016). Byudzhetnapolityka u sferi kul’tury i mystetstva: problemy i perspektyvy [Budget policy in the field of culture and art: problems and prospects]. In Sotsial’no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-economic problems of the modern period of Ukraine]: Vol. 4(120) (pp. 135-137). [in Ukrainian].
2. Klyuchko, Yu. (2006). Rozvytok sotsial’no-kul’turnoyi sfery Ukrayiny v umovakh rynkovykh vidnosyn: poshuk novykh modeley [Development of socio-cultural sphere of Ukraine in terms of market relations: search for new models]. Dyferentsiyne zabezpechennya kerivnytstva – Differential management support, 4409, 1-27. [in Ukrainian].
3. Chernets, V. H. (2012). Suchasni tendentsiyi rozvytku vitchyznyanoyi kul’tury [Current trends in the development of national culture]. Kul’tura i suchasnist’ – Culture and modernity, 2, 3-9. [in Ukrainian].
4. Kichurchak, M. V. (2010). Byudzhetne zabezpechennya sfery kul’tury Ukrayiny [Budget support for the cultural sphere of Ukraine]. Finansy Ukrayiny – Finance of Ukraine, 2, 36-45.
5. Kyrychuk, O. V., &Maksymyak, L. A. (2008). Vdoskonalennya mekhanizmiv finansuvannya kul’turno-mystets’koyi diyal’nosti v Ukrayini [Improvement of funding mechanisms for cultural and artistic activities in Ukraine]. In Efektyvnist’ derzhavnoho upravlinnya [Public administration efficiency]: Vol. 14-15 (pp. 277-285). [in Ukrainian].
6. Popadynets, N. M. (2017). Napryamy reformuvannya sfery kul’tury v umovakh sektoral’noyi detsentralizatsiyi [Areas of reforming the cultural sphere in the context of sectoral decentralization]. Rehional’na ekonomika – Regional economy, 3(85), 116-122. [in Ukrainian].
7. Hrytsenko, O. A., & Solodovnyk, V. V. (2004). Shlyakhy udoskonalennya finansuvannya kul’tury v Ukrayini [Ways to improve the financing of culture in Ukraine]: Analytical note. Retrieved from http://www.culturalstudies.in.ua/zv_2004_1.php [in Ukrainian].
8. Byudzhetnyy monitorynh: analiz vykonannya byudzhetu [Budget monitoring: analysis of budget execution] (2019). Institute for Budget and Social Economic Research: Website. Retrieved from http://www.ibser.org.ua/UserFiles/File/Monitor%20Quat%202013/KV__IV_2013_Monitoring_ukr.pdf [in Ukrainian].
9. Pro vnesennya zmin do Byudzhetnoho kodeksu Ukrayiny shchodo reformy mizhbyudzhetnykh vidnosyn [On amendments to the Budget code of Ukraine on reform of intergovernmental relations] (2014). Law of Ukraine, adopted on 2014, Dec 28, 79-VIII. Legislation of Ukraine: Website. Retrieved from http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/79-19 [in Ukrainian].
10. Libanova, E. M. (2010). Humanizm, suspil’na intehratsiya ta sotsial’nyy rozvytok [Humanism, social integration and social development]. Demohrafiya ta sotsial’na ekonomika – Demography and social economy, 2, 3-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2010.02.003. [in Ukrainian].
11. Vovkanych, S. Y. (2011). Sotsiohumanistychna paradyhma rozvytku ukrayins’koyi natsional’noyi ideyi: natsional’nyy, intehratsiynyy ta tsyvilizatsiynyy aspekty [Sociohumanist paradigm of Ukrainian national idea development: national, integration and civilizational aspects]: Scientific Report. Lviv: IRR NASU. [in Ukrainian].
12. Statystychnyy shchorichnyk Ukrayiny za 2017 rik [Statistical yearbook of Ukraine for 2017] (2018). Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/2018/zb/11/zb_seu2017_u.pdf [in Ukrainian].