UDC 330.8:338.2; JEL G30, L50
Derevyanko, O. (2019). Reputatsiyni aspekty kapitalizatsiyi pidpryyemstva [Reputational aspects of enterprise capitalization]. In Sotsial'no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 140 (6) (pp. 67-71). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/2071-4653-2019-6-12. [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 13

Authors



Derevyanko Olena Heorhiyivna

Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor

Professor of the Department of economics, accounting and finance of the National University of Food Technologies

Contacts: y.derevyanko@pr-service.com.ua

Webpages:

Resume

The article covers the problems of study of reputation as a fundamental factor of capital formation in modern conditions of activity of an enterprise. Following methods were used for the implementation of the research: system-structural and terminological analysis in order to systematize the conceptual apparatus of capitalization; scientific generalization – in the systematization of the diverse interpretations of «capitalization»; the cause-and-effect relationships to determine the reputation as a fundamental factor of capital investment in the enterprise and to provide details to the mechanisms that ensure capitalization growth in terms of reputation. The paper provides scientific arguments regarding the characterization of reputation as a linking element of intellectual and social capital that affects the quality and results of the capitalization processes. The article sets out specific mechanisms that ensure capitalization growth in terms of reputation and categorizes them as follows: securing (facilitating) the access to capital; reducing costs, primarily transaction and management ones, as a result of a company’s organizational and managerial innovations that simplify communication; increasing the productivity of assets; the effect of reducing competition in the market segments where the products of the enterprise are positioned; the effect of increasing competition among investors for the opportunity to invest in this enterprise; sustainable development with the reputation that is purposefully formed; the effect of «longevity» or life-cycle extension. The correlation between the results of capitalization and the reputation of the company in the context of the creation of Schumpeterian and reputational rent is proved. The feasibility of using the rate of return on invested (operating) capital as a formal measure of reputation in the context of capital formation at the enterprise is emphasized. Author’s position regarding the reasonably of management focus on quality business processes (the formation of trust as result of effective business processes) and the impact on the values of stakeholders (building trust as proof of relationship/identity of the company’s values and its corporate audiences), which are the powerful concepts in the growth of capitalization of the enterprises, is explained.

Keywords:

capitalization, reputation, value, trust, cost

References


1. Bukhanets, V. V., & Usherenko, S. V. (2016). Determinants of enterprise fundumantal capitalization in the conditions of post-industrial development. In Economics, management, law: socio-economic aspects of development. Vol 1. Roma: Edizioni Magi. (pp. 251-254).
2. Mendrul, O. H. (2002). Upravlinnya vartistyu pidpryyemstv [Enterprise cost management]. Kyiv: KNEU. [in Ukrainian].
3. Teplova, T. V. (2007). Investitsionnyye rychagi maksimizatsii stoimosti kompanii. Praktika rossiyskikh predpriyatiy [Investment leverage to maximize company value. Practice of Russian enterprises]. Moscow: Vershina. [in Russian].
4. Ivashkovskaya, I. V. (2009). Kapitalizatsiya: krakh ili vtoroye rozhdeniye? [Capitalization: collapse or rebirth?] Moscow: International university in Moscow. [in Russian].
5. Melnyk, O. V. (2019). Teoretyko-zmistovna ploshchyna vzayemozv’yazku katehoriyi kapitalizatsiyi pidpryyemstva [Theoretical and meaningful plane of interconnection of enterprise capitalization category]. Visnyk KNUTD. Seriya «Ekonomichni nauky» – Bulletin of KNUTD, Series: Economic sciences, 4(137), 83-94. [in Ukrainian].
6. Shevchuk, N. V. (2013). Ekonomichna pryroda kapitalizatsiyi pidpryyemstv [Economic nature of companies’ capitalization]. Aktual’ni problemy ekonomiky – Actual problems of economics, 9(147), 20-26.
7. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, R. H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660-679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.1255632.
8. Watson, P. (2006). Metody otsinky diyal’nosti PR-pidrozdilu kompaniyi [Company PR performance assessment techniques]: Best practical guide to planning, research and public relations assessment. Dnipropetrovsk: Business Book Balance. [in Ukrainian].
9. GAP (Generally Accepted Practices) (2019). International Association of Business Communicators: Website. Retrieved from https://www.iabc.com/gap-generally-accepted-practices
10. Macnamara, J. (2011). PR Metrics: How to Measure Public Relations and Corporate Communication. Deakin University: Website. Retrieved from https://deakin.rl.talis.com/items/D84050AA-7070-C7CC-AD33-9AE832709DAE.html
11. Best Practice in the Measurement and Reporting of Public relations and ROI (2004). Chartered Institute of Public Relations: Website. Retrieved from http://www.cipr.co.uk
12. Xavier, R., Mehta, A., & Gregory, A. (2006). Evaluation in Use: The Practitioner View of Effective Evaluation. PRism Online PR Journal. Vol. 4 (2). URL: http://www.prismjournal.org/fileadmin/Praxis/Files/Journal_Files/Evaluation_Issue/XAVIER_ET_AL_ARTICLE.pdf
13. Dozier, D. M. (1995). Manager’s Guide to Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203811818.