Journal
УКР   ENG
Socio-Economic Problems
of the Modern Period of Ukraine
   



Collection SEPSPU -- sep2024.04.024

Repository of Institute of Regional Research UDC 711.4+364.122.5; JEL R11, R12, O47
Lysyak, N. M., & Shchebel, A. I. (2024). Prostorovi chynnyky v modeli vymiryuvannya produktyvnoyi spromozhnosti ekonomiky rehioniv [Spatial factors in the model of measuring the productive capacity of the economy of regions]. In Sotsial'no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 168 (4) (pp. 24-32). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/2071-4653-2024-4-4 [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 13

Authors



Lysyak Natalya Mykhaylivna

Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor

Researcher of the Department of regional economic policy of the Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine; Professor of the Department of management of organizations of the Lviv Polytechnic National University

Contacts: natali.bila@gmail.com

Webpages:



Shchebel Andriy Ivanovych

Ph.D. of Economics

Associate Professor of the Department of management and social-humanitarian disciplines of the Lviv Branch of European University

Contacts: a.shchebel@gmail.com

Webpages:

Resume

The aim of the article is to identify cause-and-effect relationships and assess the impact of spatial factors on the productive capacity of the regional economy. The nature of the productive capacity of the regional economy is theoretically considered, and the characteristics of spatial factors and their possible impact on the productive capacity of the regional economy are outlined. The productive capacity of the regional economy is largely determined by concentration factors; agglomeration effects, resource provision, location conditions, level of infrastructure development, management, technologies, and human capital. At the same time, the article also identifies the factors that can significantly reduce or even limit the productive capacity of the economy – administrative fragmentation, corruption, resource limitations or loss of capacity (or fertility for agricultural lands), and "breakage of economic space". An empirical analysis and assessment of the dependence between multifactor productivity and spatial factors is conducted. Correlation-regression analysis was used as a basis, which is aimed at identifying dependencies between multifactor productivity and spatial factors. The article finds that an indicative investment density has the strongest influence on factor productivity. The influence of population density indicators and the level of population urbanization is revealed. Quantitative dependencies are established between factor productivity and indicators of real estate value in cities-regional centers of Ukraine, business density, and employment in the regions. A very weak influence of the level of education and the level of infrastructure development on factor productivity is emphasized. Generalization of the analysis results made it possible to trace the trend towards improving the values of factor productivity during 2013–2021. Among the studied regions, Kyiv, Dnipropetrovsk, Lviv, Odesa, and Poltava regions stand out, which, on the one hand, demonstrates a high level of concentration of human capital, investments, enterprises, and the labor market, and on the other hand, indicates a tendency towards spatial heterogeneity in the concentration and structure of economic assets and significant differences in the investment attractiveness of territories at the interregional and intraregional levels.

Keywords:

productive capacity, space, region, correlation-regression analysis, spatial factors

References

    
  1. Ciccone, A., & Hall, R. E. (1993). Productivity and the Density of Economic Activity. NBER Working Paper, w4313. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=478729
  2. Krugman, P. R. (1991). First Nature, Second Nature, and Metropolitan Location. NBER Working Paper, w3740. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w3740
  3. Melo, P., Graham, D. J., & Noland, R. B. (2009). A meta-analysis of estimates of urban agglomeration economies. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(3), 332-342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.12.002
  4. Tsvetkova, A., Ahrend, R., Oliveira Martins, J., Lembcke, A., Knutsson, P., Jong, D., & Terzidis, N. (2020). The spatial dimension of productivity. Connecting the dots across industries, firms and places. OECD Regional Development Working Papers, 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/ba5edb47-en
  5. Rosenthal, S. S., & Strange, W. C. (2004). Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 4, 2119-2171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80006-3
  6. Habrel, M., Lysiak, N., Habrel, M., & Dobrowolska, M. (2024). Urbanization and industrialization of space in Ukraine: Realities, changes, and forecasts for the future. MATEC WebConf., 396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202439615002
  7. Filipenko, A. S. (2017). Produktyvna spromozhnist' natsiyi: sotsial'no-ekonomichnyy vymir [The productive capacity of a nation: socio-economic dimension]. In Produktyvna spromozhnist' natsiy: pryklad Ukrayiny [The productive capacity of nations: the case of Ukraine]: Proceedings of the International scientific conference (Kyiv, Jun 29, 2017) (pp. 13-14). Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
  8. Maksymchuk, M. V. (2022). Vyznachennya instytutsiynykh determinant produktyvnoyi spromozhnosti ekonomiky [Determining the institutional determinants of the productive capacity of the economy]. In Imperatyvy ta bezpekovi priorytety zberezhennya i rozvytku produktyvnoyi spromozhnosti rehioniv Ukrayiny v umovakh viyny [Productive capacity of Ukraine’s regions preservation and development imperatives and security priorities in conditions of war]: Discussion platform proceedings (pp. 65-66). Lviv: Institute of Regional Research named after M. I. Dolishniy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://ird.gov.ua/ird02/n3381_tezy.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  9. Shults, S. L., & Lutskiv, O. M. (2022). Prostorovi ta sektoral’ni determinant produktyvnoyi spromozhnosti rehioniv: teoretychna heneza ta metodolohichni zasady doslidzhennya [Spatial and sectoral determinants of regional productive capacity: theoretical genesis and methodological principles of the study]. Rehional’na ekonomika – Regional Economy, 106(4), 5-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/1562-0905-2022-4-1 [in Ukrainian].
  10. Shults, S. L., Lutskiv, O. M., & Ozarkiv, K. S. (2022). Metodychni pidkhody do otsinky produktyvnoyi spromozhnosti ekonomiky: svitovyy ta yevropeys'kyy dosvid [Methodological approaches to the assessment of economic productivity: global and European experience]. Naukovi innovatsiyi ta peredovi tekhnolohiyi –Scientific Innovations and Advanced Technologies, 12(14), 188-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-5274-2022-12(14) [in Ukrainian].
  11. Mokiy, A. I., Nozdrina, L. V., & Pavlyshyn, A. I. (2024). Productive Capacity and Sustainable Development of Ukraine in the Conditions of War. Academy Review, 1(60), 62-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32342/2074-5354-2024-1-60-5
  12. Storonyanska, I. Z. (Ed.) (2022). Ekonomika rehioniv Ukrayiny v umovakh viyny: ryzyky ta napryamky zabezpechennya stiykosti [The Economy of Ukraine’s regions in the conditions of war: risks and directions for ensuring resilience]: Scientific and analytical report. Lviv: Institute of Regional Research named after M. I. Dolishniy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Retrieved from http://ird.gov.ua/irdp/p20220033.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  13. Shults, S. L. (Ed.) (2022). Produktyvna spromozhnist' ekonomiky rehioniv: teoretyko-metodolohichni ta prykladni aspekty [The productive capacity of regional economies: theoretical and methodological aspects]: Scientific report. Lviv: Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of the NAS of Ukraine. Retrieved from https://ird.gov.ua/irdp/p20220037.pdf [in Ukrainian].


Web-master P. Popadyuk