UDC 330.15
Marhita, N. (2017). Rehional'ni priorytety formuvannya lisohospodars'koho potentsialu [Regional priorities of the forest industry potential formation]. In Sotsial'no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 128 (6) (pp. 50-53). Retrieved from http://ird.gov.ua/sep/doi/sep2017.06.053. [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 10

Authors



Marhita Nataliya Orestivna

Ph.D. of Economics

Senior Lecturer of the Department of marketing and logistics of the Institute of Economics and Management of the Lviv Polytechnic National University

Contacts: margita-n@ukr.net

Webpages:

Resume

The article deals with the regional priorities of the forest industry potential formation. The forest industry of the region is an important component of the regional economic potential formation, which ensures of the assimilation potential of individual territories formation and the expanded reproduction of the forest resource base. Regional priorities of potential formation should take place on the basis of a comparative assessment of individual regions forestry potential, since the forest sector is characterized by uneven location of the forest resourses due to the natural and climatic factors and to the factors of socio-economic development of individual regions. The dynamics of wood production volumes shows a long-term growth trend, with two recessions in the period from 2007 to 2009, and in 2017, as compared to the previous year. The area of felling, fluctuating from 358 thousand hectares to 419 thousand hectares in the last 9 years. The application of methods of economic-mathematical modeling using data from 1997 to 2017 allows us to obtain an adequate regression line (R2 = 0.9061), which is described by a quadratic model, and gives all grounds to predict an increase in the wood logging index in 2018 to 23,684 thousand m3. The increase in indicstors of deforestation area and wood logging in Ukraine during the last period requires revision of forestry policy based on a retrospective analysis of industry trends and the assessment of regional forestry potential in order to restore the resource base. The comparative estimation of forest resources potential of Ukraine’s regions on the basis of taxonomic level development indicator of region’s forestry potential (TLD) allows to divide regions on 3 groups: 1. Regions with high level of forest resource potential (ТLD 0,98 – 0,46): Zhytomyr, Rivne, Volyn, Kyiv, Lviv, Ivano-Frankivsk, Chernigiv and Zakarpattia regions; 2. Regions with an average level of forest resource potential (TLD 0.43 – 0.29): Sumy, Vinnytsia, Khmelnytsky, Chernivtsi, Cherkasy, Poltava, Kharkiv, Kirovograd regions; 3. Regions with low level of forest resource potential (ТРР 0,26 – 0,06): Odesa, Ternopil, Mykolayiv, Kherson, Donetsk, Dnipropetrovsk, Zaporizhzhya, Lugansk regions.

Keywords:

forest industry potential, regional priorities of forest industry potential, integral indicator region’s forest industry potential

References


1. Honcharenko, T. P., & Khomutenko, Ya. V. (2014). Zasady formuvannya y rozvytku lisoresursnoho potentsialu svitu ta Ukrayiny [Principles of formation and development of forest resources potential of the world and Ukraine]. In Problemy i perspektyvy rozvytku bankivs’koyi systemy Ukrayiny [Problems and prospects of Ukraine’s banking system development]: Vol. 11 (pp. 123-138). [in Ukrainian].
2. Melnyk, T. (2013). Naroshchennya investytsiynoho potentsialu lisohospodars’koho vyrobnytstva: rehional’ni priorytety ta instytutsional’ni formy [Investment potential increasing of forest industry production: regional priorities and institutional forms]. Ekonomist – Economist, 12, 34-35. [in Ukrainian].
3. Dzyubenko, O. (2016). Investytsiyno-innovatsiyne zabezpechennya rozvytku lisovoho hospodarstva v suchasnykh umovakh [Investment and innovation support of forest forest industry development in modern conditions]. Ekonomist – Economist, 5, 54-56.
4. Holyan, V., Melnyk, T., & Shestak, M. (2014). Investytsiyna diyal’nist’ subʺyektiv lisohospodars’koho pidpryyemnytstva: osnovni problemy, peredumovy ta priorytetni napryamy vdoskonalennya [Forest enterprise investment activity: main problems, preconditions and improvemen priority directions]. Ekonomist – Economist, 6, 22-28. [in Ukrainian].
5. Mysyukevych, O. V. (2013). Zahal’na kharakterystyka lisohospodars’koyi diyal’nosti v Khmel’nyts’komu oblasnomu rehioni [General characteristics of forestry activity management in the Khmelnitsky region]. In Naukovi zapysky Ternopil’s’koho natsional’noho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni Volodymyra Hnatyuka. Seriya: Heohrafiya [Scientific Notes of the Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatyuk National Pedagogical University. Series: Geography]: Vol. 1 (pp. 249-254). [in Ukrainian].
6. Kolisnyk, B. I. (2008). Lisohospodars’kyy kompleks rehionu: suchasnyy stan ta tendentsiyi rozvytku [Forest industry of the region: the current state and development trends]. Ekonomika ta derzhava – Economy and the state, 4, 39. [in Ukrainian].
7. Boyda, S. V. (2013). Otsinka stratehichnoho potentsialu pidpryyemstv derevoobrobnoyi promyslovosti Chernivets’koyi oblasti [Strategic potential estimation of the forest industry enterprises of Chernivtsi region]. Efektyvna ekonomika – Effective economy. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/efek_2013_8_29. [in Ukrainian].
8. Koval, Ya. (2012). Priorytety ekolohichnoho ta zbalansovanoho lisoresursnoho rozvytku [Priorities of ecological and balanced forest resource development]. Ekonomist – Economist, 12, 49-51. [in Ukrainian].
9. Hellwig, Z. (1968). Zastosowanie metody taksonomicznej do typologicznego podziału krajów ze względu na poziom ich rozwoju oraz zasoby i strukture wykwalifikowanych kadr [The typonomic method used for countries typological due to their level of development, resources and qualified cadres structure]. Przeglad Statystyczny – Statistical Review, 4, 307-327. [in Polish].
10. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2016). Rehiony Ukrayiny. 2015 rik [Regions of Ukraine 2015] (Statistical publication). P. 2. Kyiv. Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/­publicat/kat_u/publ2_u.htm. [in Ukrainian].