Journal
УКР   ENG
Socio-Economic Problems
of the Modern Period of Ukraine
   



Collection SEPSPU -- sep2018.04.114

Repository of Institute of Regional Research Repository of Vernadsky Library UDC 911.375.4:316; JEL O31, O14
Pin, A. (2018). Kontseptsiya rozumnoho mista v konteksti rozvytku innovatsiynoho upravlinnya [Smart city concept within the context of the development of innovation management]. In Sotsial'no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 132 (4) (pp. 114-118). Retrieved from http://ird.gov.ua/sep/doi/sep2018.04.118. [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 12

Authors



Pin Andriy Mykhaylovych

Ph.D. of Economics

Junior Researcher of the Research part of the Ternopil National Economic University

Contacts: rockgorn@gmail.com

Webpages:

Resume

The research study examines the smart city concept on the basis of the multilateral analysis. We have outlined the principles of the smart city concept and distinguished the most efficient recommendation in terms of upgrading the traditional status-quo in order to create an innovative and technological urbanized unit. The smart city definition embraces innovative technologies adapted by public utility companies to improve cities, enhance their efficiency and provide transparent relations between the city council, the business and the public. A special emphasis is placed on smart transport and transport infrastructure. Time- and cost-efficient transport contributes significantly to the provision of city planning. We have outlined and described in detail the indicators of the modern innovative city based on the existing principles of smart city. Information is regarded as the most important resources of the modern digital era. Informational exchange between separate economies provides a noticeable momentum for their sustainable economic development in terms of quantity and quality. A society based on information technologies is considered a highly developed social unit following the trends of globalization. At this point, the all-embracing implementation of information and communication technologies is a prerequisite for the development of a modern smart city. Information and communication technologies provide full-value real-time relations between the community and the authorities. Such feedback serves the latter as an efficient indicator to improve public administration techniques and select the most appropriate approaches to administering a smart city. Specifically, applications designed for portable computer devices provide timely communication between the public and the municipal utility services to address ongoing and especially urgent issues as soon as possible. The implementation of innovative technologies provides cost-effectiveness that is of vital importance for preserving environment and promoting sustainable economic development. We suggest that reaching and maintaining high productivity as to the indicators described above means following the global tendency towards efficient resource utilization and environment preservation efforts. Comprehensive computerization provides a momentum for strengthening control over scarce resource management.

Keywords:

smart city, innovation management, smart city concept, smart-economics, e-government, rational resource utilization

References

    
  1. Hollands, R. (2015). Critical interventions into the corporate smart city. Cambridge. Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 61-77.
  2. Angelidou, M. (2017). The role of Smart City characteristics in the plans of fifteen cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 24(4), 3-28.
  3. Komninos, N., Kakderi, C., Panori, A., & Tsarchopoulos, P. (2018). Smart City planning from an evolutionary perspective. Journal of Urban Technology. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2018.1485368
  4. Stratigea, A., Papadopoulou, C. A., & Panagiotopoulou, M. (2015). Tools and technologies for planning the development of smart cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(2), 43-62.
  5. Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., Buys, L., & et al. (2018). Understanding ‘smart cities’: Intertwining development drivers with desired outcomes in a multidimensional framework. Cities. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.003
  6. Silva, B. N., Khan, M., & Han, K. (2018). Towards sustainable smart cities: A review of trends, architectures, components, and open challenges in smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38, 697-713.
  7. Anthopoulos, L. G. (2015). Understanding the smart city domain: A literature review. Transforming city governments for successful smart cities (pp. 9-21). Cham: Springer.
  8. Granath, M. (2016). The Smart City – How smart can ‘IT’ be? Discourses on digitalisation in policy and planning of urban development. PhD thesis. Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, Vol. 693. Linköping University.
  9. Kitchin, R. (2014). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1-14.
  10. Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446-454.
  11. Kyiv Smart City Concept: Website (2018). Retrieved from https://www.kyivsmartcity.com/?lang=en
  12. The Smart City Model: Website (2018). Retrieved from http://www.smart-cities.eu/?cid=2&ver=4


Web-master P. Popadyuk