Journal
УКР   ENG
Socio-Economic Problems
of the Modern Period of Ukraine
   



Collection SEPSPU -- sep2018.05.159

Repository of Institute of Regional Research Repository of Vernadsky Library UDC 339.942; JEL F02, F15
Zapukhlyak, V. Z. (2018). Hlobal'na rehionalizatsiya u formuvanni novoho svitovoho ekonomichnoho poryadku [Global regionalization in forming of new global economic order]. In Sotsial'no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 133 (5) (pp. 159-164). Retrieved from http://ird.gov.ua/sep/doi/sep2018.05.164. [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 22

Authors



Zapukhlyak Vitaliy Zinoviyovych

Ph.D. of Economics

General Director of subsidiary company "Ivano-Frankivsk Regional Enterprise of Bus Stations"

Contacts: v.zapukhlyak@gmail.com

Webpages:

Resume

The paper shows the role of regionalization processes in forming of global economic order, when there is the need for functioning of global multi-level system of cooperation of its participants. The author emphasizes that the new imperatives of forming of global economic order emerge in the system of economic relations, stipulated by structure changes and functional changes of major «actors» in global space and crisis in global management. Transformation of the system of international relations and global order is proven to take place under diverging influence of globalization and regionalization. The major features of global regionalization are the following: available spatial factors, supranational nature, available transnational networks. Theoretical approaches to understanding of global regionalization are outlined and regionalization is confirmed to display regional structuring of global space at global level. The author determines the differences of new regionalism, when humanity is shifting from the closed regional integration groupings. At the same time, creation of joint institutions and the system of multi-level management stipulates the trans- or supranational management. In spatial dimension we can observe the regional inequality of countries’ participation in global economic processes. The features of countries’ cooperation in the format «North-South» are outlined, noting different integration motives for each of the groups. For example, both economic and political factors are important for the North countries; for certain countries the recognition of their status is important in the process of integration. Despite dominating positions of the USA as a leader, the new entrepreneurship and production culture is being formed, which includes regional identity and socio-cultural differences. At the same time, special attention is paid to the possibilities of emergence of conflict situations in certain regions in the world because of inconsistent interests, contributing to unstable processes of regional integration in the regions of the world and undermining established links of regions with trade and investment partners. The authors explain that in conditions of forming of new economic order the leadership should be established nor through enforcement, but rather through agreement of all members of global community; a leader should attract other participants of global cooperation based on the interests of the whole global community – in such a way the alternative models of regional cooperation are developed. The fact that global regionalization results in emergence of global regions as a segment of global space, which provides cooperation of countries, business and public society at multilateral basis for solution of global problems is proven.

Keywords:

globalization, regionalization, global regionalization, economic integration, integration groupings, new global economic order

References

    
  1. Brzezinski, Z. (1998). The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy And Its Geostrategic Imperatives. URL: http://www.takeoverworld.info/Grand_Chessboard.pdf
  2. Defraigne, P. (2002). New Regionalism and Global Economic Governance. URL: http://cris.unu.edu/sites/cris.unu.edu/files/W-2002-2.pdf
  3. Globalism and the New Regionalism: Vol. 1. (1999). URL: https://books.google.com.ua/books?hl=uk&lr=&id=FncYDAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=global++new+regionalism&ots=dIazi-WX1U&sig=YwA68TThn36P2-VmGqfBdfwlIkM&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=global%20%20new%20regionalism&f=false
  4. Bilorus, O. H. (2003). Ekonomichna systema hlobalizmu [Economic system of globalization]. Kyiv: KNEU. [in Ukrainian].
  5. Vance Rupert, B. (1968). Region. In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Band 13, London-N.Y. (p. 377).
  6. Söderbaum, F. Formal and Informal Regionalism (2012). In Ashgate Research Companion to Regionalisms. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260228020_Formal_and_Informal_Regionalism formal and informal regionalism
  7. Krugman, P. (1995). Development, Geography and Economic Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  8. Molchanova, E. Yu. (2005). Ekonomichna rehionalizatsiya v konteksti hlobalizatsiyi svitohospodars’kykh zv”yazkiv [Economic regionalization in the context of globalization of world economic relations] (Ph.D. in Econ. Thesis, Institute of world economics and internationational relations NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine). [in Ukrainian].
  9. Lukyanenko, D. (2011). Imperatyvy hlobal’noho korporatyvnoho menedzhmentu [Imperatives of global corporate management]. Stratehiya rozvytku Ukrayiny. Ekonomika, sotsiolohiya, pravo – The development strategy of Ukraine. Economics, sociology, law, 1, 44-48. URL: http://jrnl.nau.edu.ua/index.php/SR/article/view/3972/4120 [in Ukrainian].
  10. Chuzhykov, V. I. (2008). Hlobal’na rehionalistyka: istoriya ta suchasna metodolohiya [Global regionalism: history and modern methodology]. Kyiv: KNEU. [in Ukrainian].
  11. Territorial Agenda 2020 (2011). URL: http://www.eu-territorial-agenda.eu/Reference%20Documents/Final191%20TA2020.pdf
  12. Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020. Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions (2011). Agreed at the Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development on 19 May 2011, Gödöllő, Hungary. URL: http://www.espon-usespon.eu/dane/web_usespon_library_files/1224/territorial_agenda_of_the_european_union_2020.pdf
  13. Reutov, V. Ye. (2011). Hlobal'na rehionalizatsiya yak suchasnyy vektor rozvytku hlobal'nykh ekonomichnykh transformatsiy [Global regionalization as a modern vector of global economic transformations]. Efektyvna ekonomika – Effective Economy, 11. URL: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=910 [in Ukrainian].
  14. Mathews, J. T. (1997, Jan/Feb). Power Shift. Foreign Affairs. P. 50-54.
  15. Diamond, L. (1999). Developing Democracy toward Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  16. Akhter, S., & Beno, C. (2011). An Empirical Note on Regionalization and Globalization. Multinational Business Review, 19(1), 26-35.
  17. Baldwin, R. (2011). Multilateralising 21st century regionalism. Global forum on trade reconciling regionalism and multilateralism in a post-bali world. OECD conference centre, Paris 11-12. URL: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/ersd201108_e.pdf
  18. Baldwin, R. (2017, Apr 7). Twenty First Century Regionalism, Doha, and the Future of the WTO. Economic Policy Program; WTO. URL: http://graduateinstitute.ch/ctei/ctei_people/baldwin /publications_ regionalism.html
  19. Cohesion policy 2014-2020. Investing in growth and jobs (2014). EU Cohesion Policy. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/regulation/pdf/2014/proposals/regulation2014_leaflet.pdf
  20. EU Regional policy (2018). URL: http://europa.eu/pol/reg/index_en.htm
  21. Eurostat yearbook (2018). Europe in figures Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. URL: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Europe_in_figures_-_Eurostat_yearbook
  22. Statistics database WTO (2018). URL: http://stat.wto.org/Home/WSDBHome.aspx


Web-master P. Popadyuk