Journal
УКР   ENG
Socio-Economic Problems
of the Modern Period of Ukraine
   



Collection SEPSPU -- sep2018.06.022

Repository of Institute of Regional Research Repository of Vernadsky Library UDC 65.011:656.2; JEL B41, D60, F63, M21
Yakhno, T. (2018). Pidkhid do otsinky vnesku sotsial'noyi vidpovidal'nosti biznesu v sotsial'no-ekonomichnyy rozvytok natsional'noyi ekonomiky krayiny [Approach to estimation of social responsibility of business in socio-economic development of the national economy of the country]. In Sotsial'no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 134 (6) (pp. 22-28). Retrieved from http://ird.gov.ua/sep/doi/sep2018.06.028. [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 17

Authors



Yakhno Tetyana Petrivna

Ph.D. of Economics, Associate Professor

Associate Professor of the Department of international economic relations of the Faculty of International Economic Relations of the Lviv University of Trade and Economics

Contacts: tetis74@gmail.com

Webpages:

Resume

The article focuses on the development of a methodical approach to assessing the contribution of social responsibility of business to the results of socio-economic development as an economic system of any administrative-territorial entity (city, district, region) and national economy as a whole. The principles the organization and carrying out of this assessment should be based on are outlined, and the main stages of it are described. The authors emphasize three approaches to the assessment of corporate social responsibility of particular business structures. The paper indicates that corporate strategy for the development of business structures should meet and contribute to the achievement of the main goal, which stands both for the system as a whole and for the subsystem located in the hierarchy of management at a higher level. Taking into account that the main objective of the socio-economic development of the national economy of Ukraine in the conditions of the formation of a post-industrial society is to increase its competitiveness and growth, it is absolutely logical to define priority strategic tasks, which will determine the direction of social responsibility measures of business and its contribution to socio-economic development. In order to assess the contribution of particular business structures to the results of socio-economic development of the economic system or of the administrative-territorial entity or national economy of the country as a whole, it is necessary to use a system of three groups of indicators that reflect: economic, budgetary and social effects. The paper proves that the calculated indicators make it possible to compare different structures of business in terms of their contribution to the development of the local community and society as a whole and promote the growth of their image, both in the authorities, and among the population of the region and the country as a whole.

Keywords:

social responsibility, business, forms of social responsibility, assessment, national economy, economic system, socio-economic development

References

    
  1. Andreyev, A. A. (2010). Korporativnaya sotsial’naya otvetstvennost’ kak faktor ustoychivogo razvitiya regiona [Corporate social responsibility as a factor in the sustainable development of the region]. Ph.D. in Econ. Dissertation. Chelyabinsk. [in Russian].
  2. Berezina, O. Yu. (2012). Kil’kisna otsinka sotsial’noyi vidpovidal’nosti korporatsiy [Quantitative assessment of corporate social responsibility]. Visnyk Ukrayins’koyi akademiyi bankivs’koyi spravy – Bulletin of the Ukrainian Academy of Banking, 1(32), 97-101. [in Ukrainian].
  3. Vorona, O. V. (2010). Metodychni pidkhody do otsinky rivnya sotsial’noyi vidpovidal’nosti [Methodological approaches to assessing the level of social responsibility. In Visnyk ekonomiky transportu i promyslovosti [The bulletin of transport and industry economics]: Vol. 30 (pp. 127-133). [in Ukrainian].
  4. Hrytsyna, L. I. (2008). Mekhanizm formuvannya korporatyvnoyi sotsial’noyi vidpovidal’nosti v upravlinni pidpryyemstvom [The mechanism of formation of corporate social responsibility in the management of the enterprise]. (Ph.D. in Econ. Thesis, Kharkiv, Ukraine). [in Ukrainian].
  5. Gunyayeva, N. (2004). Mezhdunarodnyye standarty v oblasti sotsial’noy otvetstvennosti. Standarty i kachestvo – Standards and quality, 10, 61-65. [in Russian].
  6. Litovchenko, S. Ye. (Ed.) (2004). Doklad o sotsial’nykh investitsiyakh v Rossii za 2004 god. Rol’ biznesa v obshchestvennom razvitii [Report on social investment in Russia in 2004. The role of business in social development]. Moscow: Managers Association. [in Russian].
  7. Yevtushenko, V. A. (2013). Otsinka korporatyvnoyi sotsial’noyi vidpovidal’nosti: metody, ob”yekty, pokaznyky [Assessment of corporate social responsibility: methods, objects, indicators]. In Visnyk Natsional’noho tekhnichnoho universytetu «Kharkivs’kyy politekhnichnyy instytut». Seriya: Tekhnichnyy prohres i efektyvnist’ vyrobnytstva” [Bulletin of the National Technical University "Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute". Series Technological progress and efficiency of production]: Vol. 46(1019) (pp. 53-63). [in Ukrainian].
  8. Guidance on social responsibility 26000 (2010). International Organization for Standartization: Website. Retrieved from isotc.iso.org
  9. Krichevskiy, N. A., & Goncharov, S. F. (2007). Korporativnaya sotsial’naya otvetstvennost’ [Corporate social responsibility]. Moscow: Publishing and Trading Corporation «Dashkov and Co». [in Russian].
  10. Kotler, F., & Lee, N. (2005). Korporatyvna sotsial’na vidpovidal’nist’. Yak zrobyty yakomoha bil’she dobra dlya vashoyi kompaniyi ta suspil’stva [Corporate social responsibility. How to do as much good as possible for your company and society]. Kyiv: Standard. [in Ukrainian].
  11. Mazuryk, O. V., & Yereskova, T. V. (2008). Sotsial’nyy audyt v systemi sotsial’noho upravlinnya [Social audit in the system of social management.]. In Metodolohiya, teoriya ta praktyka sotsiolohichnoho analizu suchasnoho suspil’stva [Methodology, theory and practice of sociological analysis of modern society]: Vol. 1 (pp. 230-233). [in Ukrainian].
  12. Mamatova, T. (2010). Mizhnarodni standarty v oblasti sotsial’noyi vidpovidal’nosti: mekhanizm adaptatsiyi dlya orhaniv derzhavnoho kontrolyu Ukrayiny [International standards in the field of social responsibility: an adaptation mechanism for Ukrainian state control bodies]. In Derzhavne upravlinnya ta mistseve samovryaduvannya [Public administration and local self-government]: Vol. 1(4) (pp. 51-53). [in Ukrainian].
  13. Proekt Ekspertnoyi rady Forumu sotsial’no vidpovidal’noho biznesu Ukrayiny «Sotsial’na vidpovidal’nist’: pryntsypy ta rekomendatsiyi shchodo zvitnosti» [Draft of Expert Council of the Forum of socially responsible business of Ukraine «Social responsibility: principles and recommendations for reporting»]. (2006, Jul 4). Association of Ukrainian Cities: Website. Retrieved from http://www.auc.org.ua/files/f1152089376.doc [in Ukrainian].
  14. Surnina, K. S. (2013). Korporatyvna sotsial’na vidpovidal’nist’ v upravlinni aktsionernymy tovarystvamy [Corporate social responsibility in the management of joint-stock companies]. Ekonomika Kryma – Crimea Economy, 1, 220-224. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/econkr_2013_1_47 [in Ukrainian].
  15. Tovma, N. A. (2009). Reytingovyye pokazateli KSO [CSR ratings]. Retrieved from http://www.rusnauka.com/5_NMIV_2009/Economics/40769.doc.htm [in Russian].
  16. The Global Compact: ohlyad diyal’nosti 2006-2009 [The Global Compact: overview of activities 2006-2009] (2009). Кyiv: Global Compact Network Ukraine. [in Ukrainian].
  17. What is SROI? (2018). Social Investment Scotland: Website. Retrieved from http://www.socialinvestmentscotland.com/our-impact


Web-master P. Popadyuk