UDC 339.35; JEL O10, O12, P17, F10, F14
Shymanovska-Dianych, L., & Pedchenko, N. (2019). Pidkhody do otsinky efektyvnosti ta rezul'tatyvnosti diyal'nosti torhovel'noho pidpryyemstva: suchasnyy pohlyad [Approaches to estimating the efficiency and performance of the trade enterprise activity: modern view]. In Sotsial'no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 135 (1) (pp. 71-77). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/2071-4653-2019-1-13. [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 19

Authors



Shymanovska-Dianych Lyudmyla Mykhaylivna

Doctor of Economics, Professor

Professor of the Department of management of the Poltava University of Economics and Trade

Contacts: ludad5846@gmail.com

Webpages:

Pedchenko Nataliya Serhiyivna

Doctor of Economics, Professor

First Vice-Rector, Professor of the Department of finance of the Poltava University of Economics and Trade

Contacts: pedchenko_ns@ukr.net

Webpages:

Resume

In the article, the existing variety of terms of "efficiency" and "performance" is structured and the features of each concept and the differences between them are defined. The article proves that it is necessary to divide the categories "performance" and "efficiency" for trade enterprises. Each of them has an independent value, equally important for the evaluation of their activities, and can not replace another concept. The authors prove that in a market economy, when the results of the work of some market actors depend on the clarity and coherence of the work of other actors, the problem of efficiency becomes decisive. The article argues that the key to the success of any enterprise, including commercial ones, lies in the continuous improvement of the efficiency and performance of their activities, systematic analysis, development and implementation of measures aimed at increasing its efficiency and performance. The approaches to assessing the efficiency and performance of the enterprise, which most fully cover the key criteria for assessing the efficiency and performance of different enterprises, are analyzed. Despite the obvious differences below the described approaches, they do not exclude each other, but only characterize the operation of the enterprise from different sides. These approaches are based on certain indicators by means of which the analysis, comparison and evaluation of the enterprise is carried out. The authors prove that this system of indicators is not ideal and does not take into account all characteristics of trade enterprises, which influence the efficiency and performance of their activities. Therefore, they suggest expanding this list, adding such indicators as an indicator of the overall assessment of the economic profitability of a trade company, the indicator of the effectiveness of the use of retail space and indirect indicators of profitability.

Keywords:

estimation, efficiency, effectiveness, approaches, indicators, trade enterprise

References


1. Andriychuk, V. H. (2004). Ekonomika ahrarnykh pidpryyemstv [Economics of agrarian enterprises]. 2nd ed. Kyiv: KNEU. [in Ukrainian].
2. Bugutskiy, A. L. (1980). Povysheniye effektivnosti truda v sel’skom khozyaystve [Improving the efficiency of labor in agriculture]. Kiev: Harvest. [in Russian].
3. Gradoboyev, Ye. V. (2009). Osobennosti otsenki effektivnosti deyatel’nosti promyshlennykh predpriyatiy [Features of the evaluation of the effectiveness of industrial enterprises]. (Ph.D. in Econ. Thesis). Irkutsk. [in Russian].
4. Derzhavnyy standart Ukrayiny. Systemy upravlinnya yakistyu. Vymohy. DSTU ISO 9001-2001 [State standard of Ukraine. Quality management systems. Requirements DSTU ISO 9001-2001] (2001). Kyiv: Derzhstandart Ukrayiny [in Ukrainian].
5. Drucker, P. F. (1994). Effektivnyy upravlyayushchiy [Effective manager]. Moscow: BCI. [in Russian].
6. Mochernyy, V. (Ed.). (2000). Ekonomichna entsyklopediya [Economic Encyclopedia]: 3 vols. Vol. 1. Kyiv: Academy. [in Ukrainian].
7. Momot, A. I., & Bakalo, E. A. (2009). Sootnosheniye ponyatiy «rezul’tativnost’» i «effektivnost’» pri osushchestvlenii proizvodstvennoy deyatel’nosti [The ratio of the concepts of «performance» and «efficiency» in the implementation of production activities]. In Problemy rozvytku ta uprovadzhennya system upravlinnya yakistyu v rehioni [Problems of development and implementation of quality management systems in the region]. Proceeding of the 6th regional scientific and practical conference (pp. 114-117). Donetsk: DonNTU. [in Russian].
8. Karaman, M. M. (2002). O sushchnosti effektivnosti i ekonomicheskoy effektivnosti sel’skokhozyaystvennogo proizvodstva v perekhodnyy period k rynochnoy ekonomike, ikh kriterii i pokazateli [On the essence of the efficiency and economic efficiency of agricultural production in the transition period to a market economy, their criteria and indicators]. Ekonomika Kryma – Economy of Crimea, 4, 10-13. [in Russian].
9. Kutsenko, A. V. (2008). Orhanizatsiyno-ekonomichnyy mekhanizm upravlinnya efektyvnistyu diyal’nosti pidpryyemstva spozhyvchoyi kooperatsiyi Ukrayiny [Organizational and economic mechanism of management of the activity of the enterprise of consumer co-operation of Ukraine]. Poltava: Poltava University of Consumer Cooperatives of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian].
10. Oleksyuk, O. I. (2009). Tekhnolohiya otsinky rezul’tatyvnosti diyal’nosti pidpryyemstva [Technology for assessing the effectiveness of the enterprise]. In Zbirnyk naukovykh prats’ Cherkas’koho derzhavnoho tekhnolohichnoho universytetu. Seriya: Ekonomichni nauky [Proceedings of Cherkasy State Technological University. Series: Economics]: Vol. 22(2) (pp. 169-173). [in Ukrainian].
11. Paderin, I. D. (2003). Nauchnyye i prakticheskiye aspekty povysheniya ekonomicheskoy effektivnosti sovremennogo predpriyatiy [Scientific and practical aspects of increasing the economic efficiency of a modern enterprise]. Visnyk Akademiyi ekonomichnykh nauk Ukrayiny – Bulletin of the Academy of Economic Sciences of Ukraine, 1, 89-95. [in Russian].
12. Panfil, L. A., & Murtazina, Ye. E. (2016). Otsenka effektivnosti deyatel’nosti predpriyatiya [Evaluation of the effectiveness of the enterprise]. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental’nykh issledovaniy – International Journal of Applied and Basic Research, 6-4, 753-756. [in Russian].
13. Rats, O. M. (2008). Vyznachennya sutnosti ponyattya «efektyvnist’ funktsionuvannya pidpryyemstva» [Determination of the essence of the concept of «efficiency of the operation of the enterprise»]. In Ekonomichnyy prostir [Economic Space]: Vol. 15 (pp. 275-285). [in Ukrainian].
14. Ricardo, D. (1929). Nachala politicheskoy ekonomiki i nalogovogo oblozheniya [On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation]. Moscow: Gosizdat. [in Russian].
15. Sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva. Osnovnyye polozheniya i slovar’ [Quality management systems. The main provisions and vocabulary]. Third Edition: ISO 9000:2005 (2005). Intersertifica. [in Russian].
16. Tishchenko, A. N., Kizim, N. A., & Dogaydaylo, Ya. V. (2005). Ekonomicheskaya rezul’tativnost’ deyatel’nosti predpriyatiya [Economic performance of the enterprise]. Kharkiv: INZhEK. [in Russian].
17. Ursul, A. D. (1985). Metodologiya nauki: deyatel’nostnyy podkhod i kontseptsiya effektivnosti [Methodology of science: the activity approach and the concept of efficiency]. In Problema effektivnosti v sovremennoy nauke (Metodologicheskiye aspekty) [The problem of efficiency in modern science (Methodological aspects)]. Kishinev: Shtiints Publishing House. [in Russian].
18. Yachmenyova, V. M., Vysochyna, M. V., & Sulyma, O. Y. (2010). Efektyvnist’ upravlinnya diyal’nistyu promyslovoho pidpryyemstva ta diahnostyka zahroz [Efficiency of management of activity of industrial enterprise and diagnostics of threats]. Simferopol: PH ARIAL. [in Ukrainian].
19. Yashchenko, O. I., & Romanyuk, O. P. (2008). In Naukovyy visnyk NLTU Ukrayiny [Scientific Bulletin of National Forestry University of Ukraine]: Vol. 18.6 (pp. 237-238). [in Ukrainian].