UDC 338.637; JEL L11, M11
Markina, I., & Ovcharuk, O. (2019). Formuvannya pryntsypu vyboru optymal'noyi planovoyi trayektoriyi antykryzovoho upravlinnya ahropererobnykh pidpryyemstv [Formation of the principle of choosing the optimal planned trajectory of crisis management of agro-processing enterprise]. In Sotsial'no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 136 (2) (pp. 60-65). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/2071-4653-2019-2-11. [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 11

Authors



Markina Iryna Anatoliyivna

Doctor of Economics, Professor

Head of the Department of management of the Poltava State Agrarian Academy

Contacts: irisla7@ukr.net, iryna.markina@pdaa.edu.ua

Webpages:

Ovcharuk Olena Mykhaylivna

Applicant of the Department of management of the Poltava State Agrarian Academy

Contacts: elena200781@gmail.com

Webpages:

Resume

Crisis management is one of the strategically important elements for the sustainable development of agro-processing enterprises, which facilitates access to the best markets, improves business conditions and realization of the country's resource potential and strengthens the industrial relations between the divisions of the enterprise. The article reveals the essence of crisis management of agro-processing enterprises and the peculiarities of its formation in the sustainable development strategic program in the market environment. Imperfection of management decision making technologies was determined to be the reason for the emergence of crisis phenomena. The contradiction of tactical methods of providing economic stability of agro-processing enterprises in the current economic activity was found to be provoking the emergence of crisis phenomena. The main directions of reforming the mechanism of crisis management of agro-processing enterprises with the use of the advantages of multi-alternative economic models in the programming of sustainable development were determined. The mechanism of long-term programming of sustainable development in the dynamic market conditions based on the use of a business-friendly enterprise model was constructed. The analysis of alternatives of economic model development on the example of the meat processing enterprise and programming of optimal development management were conducted in order to ensure maximum profitability of the invested funds. The authors confirm that the measures of adaptation to the regional conditions of the market environment allow providing the corresponding efficiency of the product set of the enterprise. However, the lack of a new approach to crisis management with different tactical tasks in shaping the development strategy impedes the development of productive assets and reduces the efficiency of the investment process of the enterprise. The directions to enhance the system of crisis management of agro-processing enterprises were defined: development of poly-business model of development of agro-processing enterprises; introduction of long-term programming of effective development and updating of production and resource base; compliance with the norms of effective use of capital to the requirements of investment processes of Ukraine and the EU.

Keywords:

agro-processing enterprises, crisis management, optimization, poly-business economic model, economic-mathematical model, efficiency, programming

References


1. Latysheva, O. V. (2018). Resursnyy potentsial pidpryyemstva: sutnist’, skladovi ta osoblyvosti upravlinnya elementamy zabezpechennya staloho rozvytku [Resource potential of the enterprise: the essence, components and features of the management elements of sustainable development]. Ekonomichnyy visnyk Donbasu – Economic Bulletin of Donbass, 3(53), 126-130. [in Ukrainian].
2. Shandova, N. V. (2018). Vyperedzhal’nyy analiz faktoriv ryzyku rozvytku promyslovykh pidpryyemstv [Out-of-the-way analysis of risk factors for the development of industrial enterprises]. Marketynh i menedzhment innovatsiy –Marketing and management of innovations, 1, 317-326. [in Ukrainian].
3. Oryekhova, A. I. (2018). Ekonomichnyy potentsial pidpryyemstva: sutnisni kharakterystyky ta strukturyzatsiya [Economic potential of the enterprise: essential characteristics and structuring]. Ekonomika i suspil’stvo – Economy and Society, 17, 308-315. [in Ukrainian].
4. Zakorko, P. P., & Breus, V. Ye. (2017). Otsinka ekonomichnoyi stiykosti pidpryyemstva [Estimation of economic stability of the enterprise]. Ekonomika i suspil’stvo – Economy and Society, 13, 464-467. [in Ukrainian].
5. Drobysheva, O. O., & Vitash, N. M. (2016). Optymizatsiya struktury osnovnykh fondiv ta yikh znachennya u dosyahnenni pidpryyemstvom svoyikh tsiley [Optimization of the structure of fixed assets and their significance in achieving the goals of the enterprise]. In Naukovyy visnyk Mukachivs’koho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriya: Ekonomika [Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series: Economy]: Vol. 2(6) (pp. 63-68). [in Ukrainian].
6. Didenko, Ye. O. (2015). Model’ anty’kry’zovoho upravlinnya pidpry’yemstvom [Model of crisis management of the enterprise]. Visnyk Kyyivs’koho natsional’noho universytetu tekhnolohiy ta dyzaynu. Ser.: Ekonomichni nauky – Bulletin of Kyiv National University of Technologies and Design. Ser.: Economics, 3(87), 53-58. [in Ukrainian].
7. Hryhorenko, Ye. O. (2012). Instrumentariy diahnostuvannya finansovoho stanu v protsesi formuvannya antykryzovoyi prohramy pidpryyemstva [Instruments for diagnosing a financial condition in the process of forming an anti-crisis program of the enterprise]. In Naukovyy visnyk Poltavs’koho universytetu ekonomiky i torhivli. Ser.: Ekonomichni nauky [Scientific Bulletin of Poltava University of Economics and Trade. Ser. Economics]: Vol. 4(55) (pp. 206-211). [in Ukrainian].
8. Hladiy, M. V., & Sychevskyy, M. P. (2018). Funktsionuvannya myasopererobnoyi haluzi Ukrayiny v hlobal’niy prodovol’chiy systemi [Functioning of the meat processing industry of Ukraine in the global food system]. Visnyk ahrarnoyi nauky – Bulletin of Agricultural Science, 5(782), 5-11. [in Ukrainian].
9. Lohosha, R. V. (2012). Stan ta tendentsiyi rozvytku pidpryyemstv m’yasopererobnoyi haluzi Ukrayiny [State and trends of development of enterprises of the meat processing industry of Ukraine]. In Zbirnyk naukovykh prats’ Vinnyts’koho natsional’noho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriya: ekonomichni nauky [Proceedings of Vinnytsia National Agrarian University. Series: Economics]: Vol. 3(69) (pp. 134-139). [in Ukrainian].
10. Shylova, O. Yu. (2013). Rozroblennya antykryzovoyi prohramy pidpryyemstva v umovakh innovatsiynoho shlyakhu rozvytku [Development of an enterprise crisis program in an innovative way of development]. Marketynh i menedzhment innovatsiy –Marketing and management of innovations, 4,173-180. [in Ukrainian].
11. Vasilkivska, T., Kabakov, Yu., Kozlovska, M., Ostapenko, O., Pravdyva O., Selinnyy, M., Tymoshenko, T. & Chabak, L. (2017). Realizatsiya vymoh shchodo tekhnichnoho rehulyuvannya v Ukrayini (ahrarnyy sektor, kharchova promyslovist’, turyzm) [Implementation of technical regulation requirements in Ukraine (agrarian sector, food industry, tourism)]. Chernihiv: Siversky Center for Postgraduate Education. [in Ukrainian].