Journal
УКР   ENG
Socio-Economic Problems
of the Modern Period of Ukraine
   



Collection SEPSPU -- sep2019.02.079

Repository of Institute of Regional Research Repository of Vernadsky Library UDC 338.24:621; JEL D92
Kudrya, Ya., & Pukala, R. (2019). Metody upravlinnya dokhidnistyu investuvannya u rozvytok pidpryyemstv [Methods of managing the return on investment in the development of enterprises]. In Sotsial'no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 136 (2) (pp. 79-81). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/2071-4653-2019-2-14. [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 9

Authors



Kudria Yaroslav Valeriyovych

Ph.D. of Economics

Senior Researcher of the Department of problems of the real sector of regions' economy of the Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine

Contacts: swiss.inc.com@gmail.com

Webpages:



Pukala Ryszard

Doctor of State Management

Vice-Rector of the Bronislaw Markiewicz State Higher School of Technology and Economics in Jaroslaw (Poland)

Contacts: zim@pwste.edu.pl, ryszard.pukala@interia.pl

Webpages:

Resume

The notion of the term the minimum allowable return on investment in the development of an industrial enterprise was defined in the article; the methods of estimation and regulation of the level of profitability investment in the development of the enterprise were offered and the main features of conduct were revealed in the article. The authors note that the simultaneous increase of growth indices of production and material efficiency continues operating cycle, but its duration is relatively less than with the increase of only the total amount of investments invested in the enterprise earlier, and it proves the efficiency of production scale growth. The paper provides for various options of the use of the suggested model that shows the mathematical dependence between the rate of increase in output and the level of current enterprise expenditures.

Keywords:

development, industrial enterprises, investment, managing, regulation, valuation

References

    
  1. Guangyan, L., Peishun, L., Xiaofeng, L., & Caiping, X. (2012). Assessment on Reform Solution of Enterprise Management and Control Model Based on Group Hierarchy Grey Method. Procedia Engineering, 37, 42-48.
  2. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (2018). Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment. American Economy Review, 7, 261-297.
  3. Knight, F. H. (2015). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston & N-Y: Houghton Mifflin.
  4. Hamilton, W. H. (2018). The Institutional Approach to Economic Theory. American Economic Review, 9, 309-318.
  5. Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (2017). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3:4, 305-360.
  6. Kaplan R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2019). Balanced Score Card. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  7. Land, A. H., & Doig, A. G. (1960). Automatic Method of Solving Discrete Programming Problems. Econometrica, 28, 497-520.
  8. Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (2015). In Search of a Useful Theory of Innovation. Research Policy, 6:1, 36-76.
  9. Abdullah, L., Jaafar, S., & Taib, I. (2013). Ranking of Human Capital Indicators Using Analytic Hierarchy Process. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 107, 22-28.


Web-master P. Popadyuk