Journal
УКР   ENG
Socio-Economic Problems
of the Modern Period of Ukraine
   



Collection SEPSPU -- sep2017.06.083

Repository of Institute of Regional Research Repository of Vernadsky Library UDC 330.15:338.14:504.05
Suhina, O. (2017). Metodolohiya vyznachennya korelyatsiynykh koefitsiyentiv asymilyatsiynykh vlastyvostey ekosystem dlya otsinyuvannya zbytkiv vid zabrudnen' [Methodology of determination of the correlation coefficients of assimilative properties of ecosystems for the estimation of damage from pollution]. In Sotsial'no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 128 (6) (pp. 83-90). Retrieved from http://ird.gov.ua/sep/doi/sep2017.06.090. [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 17

Authors



Suhina Olena Mykolayivna

Ph.D. of Economics, Senior Researcher

Senior Researcher of the Department of economic problems of environmental policy and sustainable development of the Institute of Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development of NAS of Ukraine

Contacts: olsuhina@ukr.net

Webpages:

Resume

For the first time in the world practice, concrete formalized methodological approaches to determination the accounts of the correlation coefficients of accounting for the assimilative properties of ecosystems for differentiation of the values of compensation for economic damage from environmental pollution (as a component of the author’s Classification of assimilative services of ecosystems, complemented by assimilation coefficients for various ecosystems in Ukraine) are developed. The determination of the amounts of the coefficients of ecosystem assimilation and corrective coefficients for them is formalized, that is novelty of research.

Keywords:

methodology, correlation coefficients, assimilative properties of ecosystems, differentiation of the amounts of compensation for economic damage from pollution of nature, corrective coefficients

References

    
  1. Mayer, L. A., Boufadel, M. C., Brenner, J., & et al. (2012). Approaches for Ecosystem Services Valuation for the Gulf of Mexico After the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill: Interim Report (National Research Council). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/read/13141/chapter/5
  2. Mayer, L.A., Boufadel, M.C., Brenner, J., & et al. (2013). An Ecosystem Services Approach to Assessing the Impacts of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico (The National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://dels.nas.edu/resources/static-assets/materials-based-on-reports/reports-in-brief/Ecosystem-Services-Report-Brief-Final.pdf
  3. Westerholm, D. G., & Rauch-III, S. D. (2016). Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill: Final Programmatic Damage Assessment and Restoration Plan and Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement. Silver Spring, MD: United States Department Of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
  4. Yazhlev, I. K. (2009). O sostoyanii metodicheskogo obespecheniya otsenki ushcherba prirodnoi srede v Rossiiskoi Federatsii i za rubezhom [The study of the state of the methodology support of environmental damage evaluation in the Russian Federation and abroad]. Teoriya i praktika sudebnoy ekspertizy – Theory and Practice of Forensic Science, 3 (15), 194–221 [in Russian].
  5. The State Committee of the Russian Federation of Environmental Protection (1999). [Temporary method of determination of the prevented ecological damage]. Approved by Chairman V. I. Danilov-Danilyan on 1999, March 9. Retrieved from http://meganorm.ru/Index2/1/4294849/4294849569.htm [in Russian].
  6. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES-V4.3) (2013, January). CICES for ecosystem service mapping and assessment; CICES for ecosystem accounting. – Retrieved from http://cices.eu/
  7. Suhina, E. N. (2016). Economized classification of assimilative services of ecosystems as the instrument of their monetization in the development CICES. In From Baltic to Black Sea: National Models of Economic Systems: Proceedings of the International Scientific-Practical Conference 2016, March 25, Riga: Part I (pp. 226-231). Riga: Baltija Publishing.
  8. Suhina, O. M. (2018). Ekosystemnyy pidkhid do vartisnoyi otsinky zbytkiv vid zabrudnennya navkolyshn’oho pryrodnoho seredovyshcha [Ecosystem approach to valuation of damage from environmental pollution]. Ekonomika Ukrayiny – Economy of Ukraine, 1, 54-70. [in Ukrainian].
  9. The Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 (2018, January 1). CICES should be used in association with the accompanying document: Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 and Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure. Retrieved from https://cices.eu/resources/
  10. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 (2018, January). Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure (European Environment Agency). Nottingham, UK. Retrieved from https://www.dropbox.com/s/z1g2ph2705jrjsg/Guidance%20V51%2001012018.docx?dl=0
  11. Emerton, L., & Kekulandala, L. D. C. B. (2003). Assessment of the Economic Value of Muthurajawela Wetland. Occasional Papers of IUCN, No. 4. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Regional Environmental Economics Programme (IUCN Asia).
  12. Ministry of Housing and Communal Services of Ukraine (2009). Pro zatverdzhennya Metodyky vyznachennya vidnovnoyi vartosti zelenykh nasadzhen’. [On Approval of the Methodology of Determination the Replacement Value of Green Plants]. Order, adopted on 2009, May 12, 127. Retrieved from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0549-09 [in Ukrainian].
  13. Lakyda, I. P. (2011). Kysneproduktyvnist’ modal’nykh shtuchnykh sosnyakiv mis’kykh lisiv mista Kyyeva [Oxygen productivity of modal artificial pine forests of Kyiv city]. Retrieved from http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/chem_biol/nvnau_lds/2011_164_3/11lip.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  14. Shevchyk, L. Z. (2017). Ekolohichna otsinka ta fitoremediatsiya naftozabrudnenykh gruntiv [Ecological estimation and phytoremediation of the petropolluted soils] (Ph.D. in Biol. dissertation, Institute of Physical-Organic Chemistry and Coal Chemistry of a name of L.M. Litvinenko of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Lviv, Ukraine). [in Ukrainian].
  15. Schnoor, J. L. (2002). Phytoremediation of soil and groundwater; Technology Evaluation Report TE-02-01. Pittsburhg, PA: Groundwater Remediation Technologies Analysis Centre.
  16. Supreme Council of Ukraine (2016). Protokol pro reyestry vykydiv i perenesennya zabrudnyuvachiv [Protocol on emissions registers and transfer of pollutants]. Ratified by the Law of Ukraine on 2016, February 3, 980-VIII. Retrieved from http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_l59/paran2#n2 [in Ukrainian].
  17. Lyachynska, O. (2014, June 30). Na shlyakhu do Yevropy. Fosfaty u pral’nykh poroshkakh [On the way to Europe. Phosphates in washing powders]. Website Ukrainian Truth. Retrieved from https://life.pravda.com.ua/society/2014/06/30/173620/ [in Ukrainian].


Web-master P. Popadyuk