UDC 336.71; JEL E44, G20, L10, N20
Prokhorenko, V. (2018). Metodolohiya otsinyuvannya ekonomichnoyi efektyvnosti stratehiyi rozvytku finansovoho sektoru [The methodology of economy efficiency assessment of the strategy of financial sector development]. In Sotsial'no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 130 (2) (pp. 25-30). Retrieved from http://ird.gov.ua/sep/doi/sep2018.02.030. [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 17

Authors



Prokhorenko Valeriy Petrovych

Postgraduate of the Institute of Banking Technologies and Business of the University of Banking

Contacts: vprokhor@icloud.com

Webpages:

Resume

In the conditions of the reform of the national economy of Ukraine and the implementation of many measures aimed at European integration, an important task of the state administration is to ensure conditions in which, on the one hand, the national market is protected from negative external influences (migration, financial crises, capital leakage, etc.) on the other hand, is ready for challenges of an innovative nature in all sectors of the economy. Under such circumstances, it is important to ensure scientifically sound decision-making on the formation and evaluation of a strategy for the development of the financial sector of the national economy, since the consequences of the implementation of the financial strategy directly affect the nature and dynamics of the development of the real sector of the economy. In today’s conditions of strategic transformations of the financial sector of Ukraine, it is relevant to develop a sound system for evaluating the economic efficiency of the selected strategy of financial sector development in Ukraine. The development of the system, that is, the application of a systematic approach to the implementation of the evaluation processes of the financial sector development strategy in Ukraine, is optimal in terms of the components of the financial sector and their characteristics. After all, it is the system that provides detailed disclosure of methods, functions, and evaluation purposes in terms of their interdependence and interconnection. In view of this, a study was carried out on the methodology for assessing the economic efficiency of the financial sector development strategy. In particular: the article explores the context of substantive and substantive filling of economic category concepts «efficiency», «effectiveness» and «strategy effectiveness» is considered. The context of the interpretation of these concepts in thematic exposition, use in scientific research is given. The experience of using the systems of assessing the financial stability of the financial sector, which are actively introduced in many countries of the world, is generalized. The principles and technologies for assessing the economic efficiency of the financial sector development strategy are explored. A comparative analysis of technologies for assessing the state of the financial sector was carried out.

Keywords:

efficiency, strategy effectiveness, financial sector, economic efficiency estimates, estimation technologies

References


1. Lunyakov, O. (2013). Relevantni faktory stabilnosti funktsionuvannya finansovoho sektora [Relevant factors of stability in the functioning of the financial sector]. Sotsialnoekonomichni problemy i derzhava – Socio-economic problems and the state, 1 (8), 133–140. [in Ukrainian].
2. Berezivskiy, P. (1998). Efektyvnist vyrobnytstva I formuvannya rynku produktsii skotarstva v Karpatskomu rehioni [Effi ciency of production and formation of the market of cattle breeding products in the Carpathian region]. Lviv: Ukrains’ki tekhnolohii. [in Ukrainian].
3. Fry Fred, L., Stoner Charles R., Hattwick, Richard E. (2003). Business: an integrated approach (2nd Ed.). New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
4. Drucker, P. (1963). The effective executive: The definitive guide to getting the right things done. New York: HarperCollins.
5. Fatkhutdinov, R. A. (2003). Proizvodstvennyy menedzhment [Production management]. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter. [in Russian].
6. Mejer, M. (2004). Otsenka effektivnosti biznesa. Chto budet posle Balanced Scorecard? [Business effi ciency assessment. What will happen after the balanced scorecard?]. Мoscow: Vershina. [in Russian].
7. Negomedzyanova, Ye. A., & amp; Zubkova, A. G. (2007). Formirovaniye modeli otsenki ekonomicheskoy effektivnosti generiruyushchey kompanii [Formation of the model of economic efficiency evaluation of the generating company]. Retrieved from http://www.jurnal.org/articles/2007/ekon43.html [in Russian].
8. Piters, T., Waterman, R. (1998). V poiskakh effektivnogo upravleniya (opyt luchshikh kompaniy) [In search of effective management (experience of the best companies)]. Moscow: Progress. [in Russian].
9. Byelova, I., & Bashlay, S. (2013). Vyznachennya finansovoi stabilnosti Ukrainy [Definition of financial stability of Ukraine]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho banku Ukrainy – Bulletin of the National Bank of Ukraine, 17, 25–31 [in Ukrainian].
10. Lukyanenko, I. H., & Faryna, O. I. (2016). Makrofinansova stabilnist: modeli ta metody otsinky [Macrofinance stability: models and methods of evaluation]. Kyiv: NaUKMA. [in Ukrainian].
11. Evens, O., Leone, A., Gill, M., & Hilbers, P. (2000). Macroprudential Indicators of Financial System Soundness. Occasional Paper 192, 1–49.
12. Van den End, J. W. (2006). Indicator and boundaries of financial stability. Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department. DNB Working Papers 097.
13. Sundararajan, V. [et al.]. (2002), Financial Soundness Indicators: Analytical Aspects and Country Practices, Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
14. National Credit Union Administration. (2003). NCUA Letter to Credit Unions: CAMELS Rating System. Alexandria: NCUA.
15. Čihák, M. (2004), Stress Testing: A Review of key Concepts; CNB Internal Research and Policy Note, Praha: Czech National Bank.
16. Čihák, M., & Schaeck, K. (2010). How well do aggregate prudential ratios identify banking system problems? Journal of Financial Stability, 6 (3), 130–144.
17. Svirydzenka, K. (2016). Introducing a New Broadbased Index of Financial Development. IMF Working Paper: WP/16/5. Washington.