Journal
УКР   ENG
Socio-Economic Problems
of the Modern Period of Ukraine
   



Collection SEPSPU -- sep2018.05.098

Repository of Institute of Regional Research Repository of Vernadsky Library UDC 332.012.2:338.43.02; JEL I31, O13, Q18
Kazmir, L. P., & Kazmir, P. H. (2018). Sotsioekonomichnyy pidkhid do modernizatsiyi systemy upravlinnya rozvytkom sil's'kykh terytoriy [Socioeconomic approach to the modernization of management system for rural areas development]. In Sotsial'no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 133 (5) (pp. 98-104). Retrieved from http://ird.gov.ua/sep/doi/sep2018.05.104. [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 29

Authors



Kazmir Lyubomyr Pavlovych

Ph.D. of Economics

Researcher of the Department of problems of the real sector of regions' economy of the Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine

Contacts: box5@ukr.net

Webpages:



Kazmir Pavlo Hnatovych

Ph.D. of Economics, Professor

Professor of the Department of geodesy and land management of the Sumy National Agrarian University

Webpages:

Resume

During the years of profound institutional transformations of the post-socialist period in Ukraine, the problems of socio-economic development of rural areas have become significantly aggravated. In these conditions, the most urgent need is the modernization of the rural development management system and the transition to a rural-preserving model for the development of agrarian business. The paper emphasizes that such modernization requires a substantial deepening and expansion of its theoretical and methodological basis. In this context, the role of socioeconomics as an interdisciplinary scientific direction, which contributes to a better understanding of the economic and social aspects of rural development and their interrelations, has been noted. The essence, genesis, conceptual foundations and peculiarities of the practical implementation of the socioeconomic approach to modernization of the rural development management system in the conditions of decentralization of authority and the reform of local self-government are considered. It is noted that the approval of the socioeconomic approach in the management of rural development is fully consistent with the general trends of post-nonclassical development of science, one of the decisive features of which is the rapid growth of interest in the study of the interaction of complex systems of different nature and the processes of their self-organization. The following key directions of modernization of the rural development management system are provided in the paper: modernization of the management system for economic component of rural development; formation of an effective system of management of social (socio-demographic) processes that would be aimed at increasing the well-being of rural residents; system optimization of the management institutes and structures for solving a complex of administrative tasks at the state (national), regional and municipal levels. There is a special emphasis on the need to intensify the processes of self-organization of local communities through wider use of social innovations.

Keywords:

rural areas, modernization of the management system, new pragmatism, village-preserving model of development, socioeconomic approach, decentralization, local self-government, social innovations

References

    
  1. Auzan, O. (2017). Ekonomika vsyoho. Yak instytuty vyznachayut' nashe zhyttya [Economics of all. How institutes define our life]. Kyiv: Laurus. [in Ukrainian].
  2. Borodina, O. (2010). Sotsial'ni innovatsiyi v systemi sil's'koho rozvytku: kontseptual'ni pidkhody [Social innovations in the system of rural development: conceptual approaches]. Ekonomika Ukrayiny – Economy of Ukraine, 9, 68-77. [in Ukrainian].
  3. Borshchevskyy, V. V. (2011). Suchasni problemy rozvytku sil's'kykh terytoriy Ukrayiny ta kontseptual'ni pidkhody do yikh vyrishennya [Modern problems of development of Ukrainian rural areas and conceptual approaches to their solution]. In Sotsial’no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 92(6). Suchasni problemy rozvytku sil's'kykh terytoriy [Modern problems of rural areas development] (pp. 3-9). [in Ukrainian].
  4. Hadzalo, Ya. M., & Zhuk, V. M. (2015). Naukovi osnovy rozvytku ahrarnoho pidpryyemnytstva ta sil's'kykh terytoriy za selozberihayuchoyu modellyu [Scientific fundamentals of agrarian entrepreneurship and rural areas development for a rural-preservation model]: Scientific report. Kyiv: NSC IAE. [in Ukrainian].
  5. Hubeni, Yu. (2007). Rozvytok sil's'kykh terytoriy: deyaki aspekty yevropeys'koyi teoriyi i praktyky [Rural development: some aspects of european theory and practice]. Ekonomika Ukrayiny – Economy of Ukraine, 4, 62-70. [in Ukrainian].
  6. Zadorozhnyy, G. V. (2010). O metodologicheskikh osnovaniyakh poznaniya i stanovleniya sotsial'noy ekonomiki [On the methodological foundations of cognition and the formation of the social economy]. In Sotsioekonomika [Socioeconomics]: (pp. 48-70). [in Russian].
  7. Zaloznova, Yu. S. (2015). Sotsioekonomika yak innovatsiyna model' upravlinnya suspil'nymy systemamy [Socioeconomics as an innovative model of management of social systems]. Hlobal’ni ta natsional’ni problemy ekonomiky – Global and National Economic Problems, 4, 136-141. [in Ukrainian].
  8. Zalutskyy, I. R. (2011). Aktualizatsiya priorytetiv derzhavnoyi polityky rozvytku sil's'kykh terytoriy [Actualization of the priorities of the state policy of development of rural territories]. Rehional’na ekonomika – Regional Economy, 2, 51-59. [in Ukrainian].
  9. Zaslavskaya, T. (2013). Sotsiozkonomika kak aktual'noye osnovaniye mezhdistsiplinarnoy integratsii [Socio-economics as an actual basis for interdisciplinary integration] (On book of Shabanova, M. F. Socio-economics). Voprosy ekonomiki – Economics Issues, 1, 1-17. [in Russian].
  10. Kazmir, L. P. (2011). Hnoseolohichni aspekty modernizatsiyi systemy upravlinnya sotsial'no-ekonomichnym rozvytkom sil's'kykh terytoriy rehionu [Epistemological aspects of modernization of the system of social and economic development of the rural areas of the region]. In Visnyk L’vivs’koho natsional’noho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriya: Ekonomika APK [Bulletin of the Lviv National Agrarian University. Series Economy of AIC]: Vol. 18 (2) (pp. 237-243). [in Ukrainian].
  11. Kazmir, P. H., Stupen, M. H., & Kazmir, L. P. (2011). Kontseptual'ni zasady modernizatsiyi systemy upravlinnya rozvytkom sil's'kykh terytoriy [Conceptual principles of modernization of the development management system of rural territories]. In Sotsial’no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 92(6). Suchasni problemy rozvytku sil’s’kykh terytoriy [Modern problems of development of rural areas] (pp. 81-90). [in Ukrainian].
  12. Kolodko, H. (2010). Vid ideolohiyi neoliberalizmu do novoho prahmatyzmu [From the ideology of neo-liberalism to a new pragmatism]. Ekonomika Ukrayiny – Economy of Ukraine, 9, 4-11. [in Ukrainian].
  13. Kochubey, N. V., & Kochubey, R. V. (2005). Sinergeticheskaya metodologiya issledovaniya sotsial'no-ekonomicheskikh sistem v usloviyakh informatsionnogo obshchestva [Synergetic methodology for the study of socio-economic systems in the information society]. In Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskiye problemy informatsionnogo obshchestva [Socio-economic problems of the information society]: (pp. 313-331). Sumy: University Book. [in Ukrainian].
  14. Monastyrskyy, H. L. (2010). Modernizatsiyna paradyhma upravlinnya ekonomichnym rozvytkom terytorial'nykh spil'not bazovoho rivnya [Modernization paradigm of management of economic development of territorial communities of the basic level]. Ternopil: Economic Thought. [in Ukrainian].
  15. Novikova, O. F. (2009). Sotsioekonomika: potreba stanovlennya y rozvytok v Ukrayini [Socioeconomics: the need for formation and development in Ukraine]. In Sotsioekonomika [Socioeconomics] (pp. 2-16). [in Ukrainian].
  16. Pavlov, O. I. (2016). Ahroekonomichnyy, fizyoekonomichnyy, sotsioekonomichnyy ta ruralistychnyy pidkhody do doslidzhennya sil's'kykh terytoriy [Agroeconomic, physico-economic, socioeconomic and ruralistic approaches to the study of rural territories]. Ekonomika APK – The Economy of Agro-Industrial Complex, 1, 56-63. [in Ukrainian].
  17. Storonyanska, I. Z., & Patytska, Kh. O. (2017). Problemy ta napryamy optymizatsiyi protsesu formuvannya OTH: za rezul'tatamy pershoho etapu administratyvno-finansovoyi detsentralizatsiyi [Problems and directions of optimization of the process of formation of UTC: according to the results of the first stage of administrative and financial decentralization]. Rehional’na ekonomika – Regional Economy, 4, 5-13. [in Ukrainian].
  18. Sukhikh, V. A. (2009). Teoretiko-metodologicheskiye i nauchno-prakticheskiye osnovy formirovaniya sotsioekonomiki v prostranstve regiona [Theoretic-methodological and scientific-practical bases of formation of socioeconomics in the region's space]. In Sotsioekonomika [Socioeconomics]: (pp. 2-16). [in Russian].
  19. Tarasevych, V. (2004). Postneklasychna nauka ta ekonomichna teoriya [Post-classical science and economic theory]. Ekonomika Ukrayiny – Economy of Ukraine, 2, 59-65. [in Ukrainian].
  20. Trynko, R. (2014). Problemni vektory sotsial'no-ekonomichnoho rozvytku Ukrayiny [Problematic vectors of socio-economic development of Ukraine]. Lviv. [in Ukrainian].
  21. Heyets, V. M., Borodina, O. M., & Prokopa, I. V. (Eds.) (2012). Ukrayins'ka model' ahrarnoho rozvytku ta yiyi sotsioekonomichna pereoriyentatsiya [Ukrainian model of agrarian development and its socioeconomic reorientation]: Scientific Report. Kyiv: Institute for Economics and Forecasting of Ukrainian NAS. [in Ukrainian].
  22. Shabanova, M. A. (2006). Sotsioekonomika: ot paradigmy k novoy nauke [Socioeconomy: from the paradigm to the new science]. Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost' – Social Sciences and Modernity, 1, 121-133. [in Ukrainian].
  23. Etzioni, A. (2002). Sotsioekonomika: dal'neyshiye shagi [Socioeconomics: further steps]. In Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya [Economic Sociology]: Vol. 3 (1) (pp. 65-71). [in Ukrainian].
  24. Yurchyshyn, V. V. (2013). Do problemy systemnoyi pereoriyentatsiyi rozvytku ahrosfery na zasadakh sotsioekonomiky [On the problem of systemic reorientation of agrosphere development on the basis of socioeconomics]. Ekonomika APK – The Economy of Agro-Industrial Complex, 11, 6-17. [in Ukrainian].
  25. Drabenstott, M., & Henderson, J. (2006). A New Rural Economy: A new role for public policy. Management Quarterly, 47(4), 4-18.
  26. Kapur, B. K. (1999). Harmonization between communitarian ethics and market economics. Journal of Markets and Morality, 1 (2), 35-52.
  27. Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E., & Gonzalez, S. (2005). Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban studies, 42(11), 1969-1990.
  28. OECD Rural Policy Reviews. The New Rural Paradigm: Policies and Governance (2006). Paris.
  29. Roth M., Nobis R., Stetsyuk V., & Kruhlov I. (Eds.) (2008). Transformation Processes in the Western Ukraine – Concepts for a Sustainable Land Use. Berlin: Weißensee Verlag.


Web-master P. Popadyuk