Journal
УКР   ENG
Socio-Economic Problems
of the Modern Period of Ukraine
   



Collection SEPSPU -- sep2021.06.003

Repository of Institute of Regional Research UDC 332.1:352.1; JEL H70, L30, O15, R58
Nestor, O. (2021). Upravlins'ki aktyvy yak chynnyk rozvytku terytorial'noyi hromady [Managerial assets as a factor of territorial community development]. In Sotsial'no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 152 (6) (pp. 3-8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/2071-4653-2021-6-1. [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 27

Authors



Nestor Olha Yuriyivna

Ph.D. of Economics

Researcher of the Department of regional financial policy of the Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine

Contacts: olhanestor@gmail.com, (+38098)543-2885

Webpages:

Resume

The article addresses the peculiarities of managerial assets’ impact on the development of a territorial community. Managerial assets are the driving force of positive changes and development of a territorial community since they make responsible decisions and detect, indicate, and eliminate flaws in resource managerial and processes in consolidated territorial communities. Therefore, it is essential to disclose their role and features of impact on the development of territorial communities. The article considers the nature of such concepts as the development of a territorial community and economic development of a territorial community, explains the difference between them, and outlines identification attributes that characterize the community development. The advantages of local residents’ participation in securing the development of their territorial communities are disclosed. Managerial assets of a territorial community are suggested to be regarded as a set of highly qualified specialists in asset managerial in territorial communities who have leadership qualities, a defined set of skills, enough experience to conduct efficient professional activity, and can study quick and qualitatively and adapt to changes. The importance of the territorial identity of a territorial community’s managerial assets is emphasized since it will serve as a powerful incentive for the managerial assets of the territorial community to use its competences to work on the implementation of positive changes in the territorial community. The bottlenecks of managerial assets of public, private, and non-governmental sectors that stipulate the features of their impact on the development of territorial communities are described. The article specifies that cooperation between managerial assets of public, private, and non-governmental sectors is quite essential as coordinated cooperation between them allows fighting the pressure of interest groups and securing an efficient work of each of the sectors, and thus boosts the development of the territorial community.

Keywords:

managerial asset, development, territorial community, regional economy

References

    
  1. Heylen, F., Willems, E., & Beyers, J. (2020). Do Professionals Take Over? Professionalisation and Membership Influence in Civil Society Organisations. Voluntas, 31, 1226-1238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00214-9
  2. Arnstein, Sh. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216-224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
  3. Halpin, D. R., & Fraussen, B. (2017). Laying the groundwork: Linking internal agenda-setting processes of interest groups to their role in policy making. Administration and Society, 51(8), 1337-1359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399717728094
  4. Novikova, N. L., Naumenko, R. A., & Ilina, A. O. (2018). Markery profesiynoyi kompetentnosti derzhavnykh sluzhbovtsiv [Markers of professional competence of civil servants]. Ekonomika Ukrayiny – Economy of Ukraine, 9(682), 85-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2018.09.085 [in Ukrainian].
  5. Zayats, T. A., & Krayevska, H. O. (2020). Rozvytok sotsial’noho kapitalu terytorial’nykh hromad v Ukrayini [Social capital development of territorial communities in Ukraine]. Ekonomika Ukrayiny – Economy of Ukraine, 12, 56-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2020.12.056 [in Ukrainian].
  6. Galston, W. A. & Baehler, K. J. (1995). Rural Development in the United States: Connecting Theory, Practice, and Possibilities. Washington D C.: Island Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1243835
  7. Christenson, J. A. (1989). Themes of Community Development. In Christenson, J. A., & Robinson J. W. (Eds.). Community Development in Perspective (pp. 26-47). Ames, I A: Iowa State University Press.
  8. Long, H. B., Anderson, R. C., & Blubaugh, J. A. (Eds.). (1973). Approach fo Community Development. Iowa City, IA: National University Extension Association and The American College Testing Program.
  9. Grewe, N. R. (2003). Social capital and local development: an exploration of three forms of community-based social capital. Ph.D. Dissertation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31274/rtd-180813-15341
  10. Blair, J. P. (1995). Local Economic Development: Analysis and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  11. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2003). Collaborative policymaking: Governance through dialogue in deliberative policy analyses. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511490934.003
  12. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory and Practice, 5(4), 419-436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935042000293170
  13. Berger-Schmitt, R. (2000). Social cohesion as an aspect of the quality of societies: concept and measurement. Mannheim. Retrieved from https://www.gesis.org/fileadmin/upload/dienstleistung/daten/soz_indikatoren/eusi/paper14.pdf
  14. Gilliland, D. I., & Bellow, D. C. (2002). Two sides to attitudinal commitment: The effect of calculative and loyalty commitment on enforcement mechanism in distribution channels. Journal of Academy Marketing, 30(1), 24-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03079450094306
  15. Van Beuningen, J., & Schmeets, H. (2013). Social capital in 2009: An index for the Netherlands. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 72(1), 73-90. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.02.007
  16. Sabet, N. S., & Khaksar, S. (2020). The performance of local government, social capital and participation of villagers in sustainable rural development. The Social Science Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2020.1782649
  17. Hawkins, Ch. V., & Wang X. H. (2012). Sustainable Development Governance: Citizen Participation and Support Networks in Local Sustainability Initiatives. Public Works Management & Policy, 17(1), 7-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X11429045
  18. Nestor, O. Yu. (2021). Upravlins’kyy aktyv terytorial’nykh hromad: teoretychni pidkhody ta prykladni aspekty [Management assets of territorial communities: theoretical approaches and applied aspects]. In Sotsial’no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Social-economic problems of the modern period of Ukraine]: Vol. 1(147) (pp. 21-26). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/2071-4653-2021-1-4 [in Ukrainian].
  19. Kolzow D. R. (2009). Developing community leadership skills. In R. Phillips, R. H. Pittman (Eds.). An introduction to community development. New York: Routledge,
  20. Logan, J. R., & Molotch, H. (1987). Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley: University of California Press. Retrieved from 383p.http://www.gbv.de/dms/bowker/toc/9780520063419.pdf
  21. Baldych, N., Hnydyuk, N., & Trutkovsky, Ts. (2019). Doslidzhennya navchal’nykh potreb predstavnykiv orhaniv mistsevoho samovryaduvannya v Ukrayini [Study of educational needs of representatives of local governments of Ukraine]: Analytical report. Retrieved from https://nads.gov.ua/storage/app/sites/5/DIYALNIST/PROFF%20NAVCHANJA/PIDVISCH%20KVALIFICACII/analiichnii-zvit-tna-ukraine-2018-2019-final-report-ukr-f-1.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  22. Stratehiya rozvutku haluzi [Industry development strategy] (2021). Association of Ukrainian Cities: Website. Retrieved from https://auc.org.ua/galuz/kadry-ta-organizaciya-roboty#problems [in Ukrainian].
  23. Pro orhany samoorhanizatsiyi naselennya [About bodies of self-organization of the population] (2001). Law of Ukraine, adopted on 2001, Jul 11, 2625-III. Legislation of Ukraine: Website. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2625-14 [in Ukrainian].
  24. Kil’kist’ yurydychnykh osib za orhanizatsiynymy formamy [Number of legal entities by organizational forms] (2017). State Statistics Service of Ukraine: Website. Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/edrpoy/ukr/EDRPU_2017/ks_opfg/arh_ks_opfg_17.htm [in Ukrainian].
  25. Mayko, T. S. (2017). Uchast’ terytorial’noyi hromady v upravlinni na mistsevomu rivni [Participation of the territorial community in local government]. In Aktual’ni problemy polityky [Current policy issues]: Vol. 59 (pp. 188-197). [in Ukrainian].
  26. Hwang, H., & Powell, W. W. (2009). The rationalization of charity: The influences of professionalism in the nonprofit sector. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2), 268-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2009.54.2.268
  27. De Bruycker, I., Berkhout, J., & Hanegraaff, M. (2019). The paradox of collective action: Linking interest aggregation and interest articulation in EU legislative lobbying. Governance, 32(2), 295-312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12373


Web-master P. Popadyuk