Journal
УКР   ENG
Socio-Economic Problems
of the Modern Period of Ukraine
   



Collection SEPSPU -- sep2025.01.068

Repository of Institute of Regional Research UDC 338.43:711.168:005.336.4(477); JEL Q18, O13, O15
Kazmir, L. P., & Koziy, H. V. (2025). Intelektual'nyy kapital yak chynnyk povoyennoho vidnovlennya ta rozvytku ahroprodovol'choho sektoru ekonomiky Ukrayiny [Intellectual capital as a factor of post-war recovery and development of the agri-food sector of the Ukrainian economy]. In Sotsial'no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 171 (1) (pp. 68-74). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/2071-4653-2025-1-9 [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 24

Authors



Kazmir Lyubomyr Pavlovych

Ph.D. of Economics

Researcher of the Department of problems of the real sector of regions' economy of the Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine

Contacts: box5@ukr.net

Webpages:



Koziy Halyna Volodymyrivna

Teacher of the highest category of the Kitsman Vocational College of the Рodillia State University

Contacts: kozij.galina@ukr.net

Webpages:

Resume

Russian military aggression caused enormous losses to the economy of Ukraine. Therefore, the analysis of the prospects for its post-war recovery and further development in the general context of modern geopolitical and technological challenges is particularly important. The article examines the essence and features of identifying intellectual capital as a strategic asset not only of individual companies, but also of regions and the national economy as a whole. It determines the role of intellectual capital in the post-war recovery and further development of the agri-food sector of the Ukrainian economy (covering all activities related to the production, storage, transportation and sale of food products, as well as providing these processes with the necessary resources). In this case, a three-component model of intellectual capital is used (with the division of human, structural and relational capital as structural components of intellectual capital). The authors separately note that the effectiveness of the use of intellectual capital depends on the proper functioning of the institutional environment, capable of ensuring the coordination of socio-economic interaction of key actors, and the effectiveness of the intellectual capital management system at all levels. Priority measures necessary for the post-war recovery of the national agri-food system (AFS), as well as directions for stimulating the development of intellectual capital of AFSs at the national and regional levels, are identified. Creating a pilot experimental coordination and advisory body on new technologies and innovative development of the regional AFS is suggested in order to create the necessary prerequisites for the effective and innovative development of the national AFS, increase its competitiveness and stimulate the development of the intellectual capital of the AFSs at the regional level. It would coordinate the activities of state authorities, local governments, scientific and educational institutions, business, and public organizations to support and activate the absorption of new knowledge, production and management innovations in the agricultural sector of the region. The authors conclude that the intellectualization of the management system of the agri-food sector of the Ukrainian economy is a necessary condition for its effective post-war recovery and activation of further development.

Keywords:

agri-food system, intellectual capital, human capital, structural capital, relational capital, agribusiness

References

    
  1. Lamine, C., Magda, D., & Amiot, M. J. (2019). Crossing sociological, ecological, and nutritional perspectives on agrifood systems transitions: Towards a transdisciplinary territorial approach. Sustainability, 11(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051284
  2. Lamine, C., Renting, H., Rossi, A., Wiskerke, J. H., & Brunori, G. (2012). Agri-food systems and territorial development: innovations, new dynamics and changing governance mechanisms. In Farming Systems Research into the 21st century: The new dynamic (pp. 229-256). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2_11
  3. Kazmir, L. P. (2019). Suchasni paradyhmy rozvytku rehional’nykh ahroprodovol’chykh system [Modern development paradigms of regional agrifood systems]. Rehional’na ekonomika – Regional economy, 4, 94-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/1562-0905-2019-4-8 [in Ukrainian].
  4. Mkumbukiy, A., Loghmani-Khouzani, T., Madani, K., & Guenther, E. (2025). Agrifood systems’ resilience for sustainable food security amid geopolitical tensions: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1546851
  5. Sidenko, V. R. (2021). Vyklyky i ryzyky tsyfrovoyi transformatsiyi: svitovyy ta ukrayins’kyy konteksty [Challenges and risks of digital transformation: global and Ukrainian contexts]. Ekonomika Ukrayiny – Economy of Ukraine, 5, 40-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/economyukr.2021.05.040Sidenko [in Ukrainian].
  6. Bryukhovetska, N. Yu., & Chorna, O A. (2019). Intelektualizatsiya yak priorytetnyy napryam rozvytku promyslovykh pidpryyemstv v umovakh Industriyi 4.0 [Intellectualization as a priority direction of industrial enterprises development in the conditions of Industry 4.0]. Ekonomika promyslovosti – Industrial economics, 4 (88), 28-57. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2019.04.028 [in Ukrainian].
  7. Boyko, L., & Boyko, V. (2023). Suchasnyy stan ahrobiznesu v Ukrayini ta yoho revitalizatsiya u pislyavoyennyy period [The current state of agribusiness in Ukraine and its revitalization in the post-war period]. Tavriys'kyy naukovyy visnyk. Seriya: Ekonomika [Tavria Scientific Bulletin. Series: Economics], Vol. 16 (pp. 55-61). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2708-0366/2023.16.7 [in Ukrainian].
  8. Horodnichenko, Yu., Solohub, I., & Veder di Mauro, B. (Eds) (2022). Vidbudova Ukrayiny: pryntsypy ta polityka [Reconstruction of Ukraine: principles and policies]. Paris: CEPR Press. [in Ukrainian].
  9. Kazmir, L. P. (2021). Intelektual'nyy kapital yak chynnyk strukturnoyi transformatsiyi ekonomiky rehionu [Intellectual capital as a factor in the structural transformation of the region’s economy]. In Aktual'ni problemy, priorytetni napryamky ta stratehiyi rozvytku Ukrayiny [Current problems, priority areas and strategies for the development of Ukraine]: Proceedings of the II International Scientific and Practical Online Conference (pp. 116-118). Kyiv: ITTA. [in Ukrainian].
  10. Hrishnova, O. A. (2014). Lyuds'kyy, intelektual'nyy i sotsial'nyy kapital Ukrayiny: sutnist', vzayemozv"yazok, otsinka, napryamy rozvytku [Human, intellectual and social capital of Ukraine: essence, interrelation, assessment, development directions]. In Sotsial'no-trudovi vidnosyny: teoriya ta praktyka [Social and labor relations: theory and practice]: Vol. 1 (pp. 34-42). [in Ukrainian].
  11. Petrenko, V. (2006). Upravlinnya protsesamy intelektokorystuvannya v sotsial'no-ekonomichnykh systemakh [Management of intellectual use processes in socio-economic systems]. Ivano-Frankivsk: New dawn. [in Ukrainian].
  12. Cherevko, H. V. (2008). Intelektual'na vlasnist' [Intellectual property]: Tutorial. Kyiv: Knowledge. [in Ukrainian].
  13. Dobija, M. (2002). Kapitał ludzki i intelektualny w aspekcie teorii rachunkowości [Human and intellectual capital in the aspect of accounting theory]. Przegląd Organizacji – Organization Overview, 1, 8-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33141/po.2002.01.02 [in Polish].
  14. Harris, L. (2000). A theory of intellectual capital. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 2(1), 22-37.
  15. Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (2001). Kapitał intelektualny [Intellectual capital]. Warszawa: Polish Scientific Publishing House. [in Polish].
  16. Secundo, G., Del Vecchio, P., & Passiante, G. (2017). Human, relational and structural capitals in supporting the growth of intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(1), 141-158.
  17. Toma, P., & Laurens, P. (2024). Regional development and intellectual capital: Unveiling the innovation-tradition dilemma. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.102087
  18. Bortis, H. (2007). Institutions, Behavior and Economic Theory: A Contribution to Classical-Keynesian Political Economy. Trans. from English. Kyiv: Kyiv-Mohyla Academy. [in Ukrainian].
  19. Parakhonskyy, B. O., & Yavorska, H. M. (2022). Porodzhennya viyny z bezsyllya myru: smyslova lohika viyny [The emergence of war from the fragile peace: the semantic logic of war]. Stratehichna panorama – Strategic panorama, Special Issue, 12-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53679/2616-9460.specialissue.2022.02 [in Ukrainian].
  20. Sytnyk, Y. S. (2012). Kontseptual'ni zasady intelektualizatsiyi system menedzhmentu pidpryyemstva [Conceptual grounds for intellectualization of enterprise management systems]. Aktual'ni problemy ekonomiky – Current Problems of Economy, 8, 198-208. [in Ukrainian].
  21. Quinn, J. B. (1992). The intelligent enterprise: A new paradigm. The Executive, 6(4), 48-63.
  22. Martensson, M. (2000). A critical review of knowledge management as a management tool. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(3), 204-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270010350002
  23. Evans, C. (2003). Managing for knowledge – HR’s strategic role. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080479125
  24. Chemerys, V. A., & Kazmir, L. P. (2018). Kontseptual'ni zasady stratehuvannya innovatsiynoho rozvytku sil's'kykh terytoriy na rehional'nomu rivni [Conceptual basics of rural areas innovation development strategizing at regional level]. In Sotsial'no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 4 (pp. 79-84). [in Ukrainian].


Web-master P. Popadyuk