Head of the Department of technological forecasting and innovation policy of the Institute for Economics and Forecasting of NAS of Ukraine; Professor of the Department of management of the Faculty of Economics, Management and Psychology of the Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics; Head of Center of the Center for economic policy studies of the Institute of expert-analytical and scientific research of the National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine
From the viewpoint of economic theory, art becomes a rightful economic entity in market relations through the forming of the artistic market (market of art, art-market), where aesthetical and commercial values interact and make the ground for the perception of the artwork as a good and forming of respective economic behavior principles. The art-market still remains to be at the emerging stage in conditions of Ukrainian reality. Yet the lack of modern understanding of the role the art plays in the economic development of the state and cultural and artistic policy adequate to civilizational challenges prevent our country from taking a decent place in the western world. The paper defines the role of art in conditions of globalization as a specific type of spiritual-practical understanding of reality, which in its artistic-descriptive form provides for the perception of the world integrally in the context of aesthetics and emotions, strengthening human values and helping deeper and brighter understanding of the nature and importance of processes at certain historical stages of human development. Current features and trends of art-market development in the world and in Ukraine are characterized, including the special relationship to globalization processes and civilization development, enthusiasm over artwork and passion to purchase of modern art-products as an investment capital; modernization of traditional functions of artistic institutions and new role of mediators; lack of clear price policy and the impossibility of pricing control; virtualization of art-market under the impact of modern information-telecommunication technologies, etc. The art-market as an objective reality of nowadays is substantiated to be included in modernized market processes based on the partnership of artists and businesses. In this context, the artwork market should be considered as an aesthetic-practical system, in which activity in the art industry is of commercial nature, which requires the activation of innovative marketing instruments.
The paper outlines the role and place of an individual in the development of post-industrial society. The peculiarities of forming of new type of relations with technosphere, stipulated by socialization of technologies and introduction of results of fourth industrial revolution (4.0 Industry) are defined. The author analyzes and systematizes possible consequences of its both positive and negative impact on an individual. In particular, the latest industrial revolution influences the ethics, aesthetics and other components of human personality. The undefined or simultaneously positive and negative effect includes cultural changes, the loss of human communication, improvement of performance, and the fact that the extended cognitive human capacities lead to new types of behaviour. The paper emphasizes that socialization of modern technological development requires the forming of new models of human behaviour and relevant competences necessary for labour market. Educational organizations have an especially important role in this process, because they have to provide the graduates of professional schools and universities ready to enter the labour market with practical instruments, which include the skills in the sphere of digital economy (digital competences). The recommendations on forming of relevant strategies of development of Ukrainian society are estimated with regard to their ability to withstand the challenges of new industrial revolution, to use favourable conditions for socio-economic growth and to prevent risks in the future. The role of governing bodies of various management levels in the development of digitalization policy and prognosis of the risks of advance technologies’ influence on social environment is essential. The results of industrial revolution that is swiftly expanding globally are an argument that economic and social sciences should develop integration theory, the provisions of which should not only explain the nature of technological imperative, but also be used for the protection of human social interests. They should provide scientifically grounded answers to the challenges and predict social changes both at the level of certain countries and international community in general.
fourth industrial revolution, society, individual, social development, socialization, technologies
Citations
Vorotin, V. Ye., Zhalilo, Ya. A., Bila, S. O., & et al. (2010). Derzhavne upravlinnya rehional’nym rozvytkom Ukrayiny [State governance by regional development of Ukraine]. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian]. {sep2017.06.029.002}
Davymuka, S. A., & Fedulova, L. I. (2018). Teoretyko-metodolohichnyy dyskurs suchasnoho rehional’noho innovatsiynoho rozvytku [Theoretical and Methodological Discourse of Modern Regional Innovation Development]. Rehional’na ekonomika – Regional Economy, 1, 5-16. [in Ukrainian]. {sep2018.04.079.002}
Fedulova, L. I. (2009). Orhanizatsiyni mekhanizmy formuvannya rezul’tatyvnoyi rehional’noyi innovatsiynoyi systemy [Organizational mechanisms for the formation of a productive regional innovation system]. In Stratehichni priorytety [Strategic Priorities]: Vol. 4 (pp. 157-165). [in Ukrainian]. {sep2018.04.079.014}
Fedulova, L. I. (2014). Kontseptualni zasady upravlinnia innovatsiinym rozvytkom pidpryiemstv [Conceptual principles of management of innovative development of enterprises]. Marketynh i menedzhment innovatsiy – Marketing and Management of Innovations, 2, 122-135. [in Ukrainian]. {sep2018.06.035.007}
Androshchuk, H. O., Davymuka, S. A., & Fedulova, L. I. (2015). Natsional’ni innovatsiyni systemy: evolyutsiya, determinanty rezul’tatyvnosti. Kyiv: Parlament Publishing. [in Ukrainian]. {sep2019.01.015.003}
Fedulova, L. I. (2008). Doslidzhennya metodyk otsinyuvannya innovatsiynoho potentsialu promyslovykh pidpryyemstv [Research of methods of evaluation of innovative potential of industrial enterprises]. Derzhava ta rehiony – The state and the regions, 4, 234-240. [in Ukrainian]. {sep2019.02.066.005}
Mazaraki, A. A., & Fedulova, L. I. (2017). Kontseptual'ni zasady upravlinnya innovatsiynym rozvytkom pidpryyemstv sfery torhivli [Conceptual principles for managing the innovative development of trade enterprises]. In Pidpryyemnytstvo i torhivlya [Business and trade]: Vol. 21. (pp. 20-25). [in Ukrainian]. {sep2019.03.050.002}
Fedulova, L. I. (2011). Tendentsiyi rozvytku innovatsiynoyi polityky ta yiyi vplyv na ekonomichne zrostannya [Trends in the development of innovation policy and its impact on economic growth]. Ekonomika i prohnozuvannya – Economy and forecasting, 2, 63-81. [in Ukrainian]. {sep2019.04.003.007}
Fedulova, L. I. (2012). Kontseptual’na model’ innovatsiynoyi stratehiyi Ukrayiny [Conceptual model of innovation strategy of Ukraine]. Ekonomika i prohnozuvannya – Economy and forecasting, 1, 87-100. [in Ukrainian]. {sep2020.01.003.006}
Davymuka, S. A., & Fedulova, L. I. (2017). Kreatyvnyy sektor ekonomiky: dosvid ta napryamy rozbudovy [Creative sector of economy: experience and directions of development]. Lviv: Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian]. {sep2020.06.023.003}
Fedulova, L. I. (2006). Innovatsiyna ekonomika [Innovative Economics]: Textbook. Kyiv: Lybid’. [in Ukrainian]. {sep2020.06.125.007}
Davymuka, S. A., & Fedulova, L. I. (2019). Kul’turnyy imperatyv sotsial’no-ekonomichnoho rozvytku: tsyvilizatsiynyy aspekt [Cultural imperative of socio-economic development: civilizational aspect]. Lviv: Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian]. {sep2021.04.003.002}
Fedulova, L. I. (2018). Tendentsiyi innovatsiynoho rozvytku ekonomiky Ukrayiny yak rezul’tat derzhavnoyi polityky [Trends in innovative development of Ukraine’s economy as a result of public policy]. Innovatsiyna ekonomika – Innovative economy, 1-2, 11-19. [in Ukrainian]. {sep2021.06.025.011}
Davymuka, S. A., Kuybida, V. S., & Fedulova, L. I. (2019). Tendentsiyi rozvytku novoyi-rehional'noyi polityky krayin-chleniv Yevropeys’koho Soyuzu [Trends in the development of the new regional policy of the member states of the European Union] Rehional'na ekonomika – Regional economy, 1,76-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/1562-0905-2019-1-9 [in Ukrainian]. {sep2023.01.003.003}
Fedulova, L. I., & Yemelyanenko, L. M. (2020). Adaptatsiya pryntsypiv novoyi rehional'noyi polityky YeS v stratehichnomu kursi rehional'noho rozvytku Ukrayiny [Adaptation of new regional policy principles of EU in strategic course of regional development of Ukraine]. Efektyvna ekonomika – Efficient economy, 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2020.11.13 [in Ukrainian]. {sep2023.01.003.004}
Fedulova, L. I., & Yemelyanenko L. M. (2020). Investuvannia v tsyfrovu ekonomiku: hlobalni tendentsii ta praktyka Ukrainy [Invest in the digital economy: global trends and practices of Ukraine]. Ekonomika ta derzhava – Economy and the state, 4, 6-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6806.2020.4.6 [in Ukrainian]. {sep2023.02.022.009}
УКР
fedulova2010@gmail.com
sveta_fedulova@ukr.net
