UDC 31.1.027:631.11:636.002.6; JEL Q13, Q18
Lozynska, I., & Danko, Yu. (2018). Stratehichni priorytety rozvytku skotarstva v ahrarnykh pidpryyemstvakh [Strategic priorities of animal husbandry development at agricultural enterprises]. In Sotsial'no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 129 (1) (pp. 152-157). Retrieved from http://ird.gov.ua/sep/doi/sep2018.01.157. [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 7

Authors



Lozynska Inna Vitaliyivna

Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor

Professor of the Department of economics of the Sumy National Agrarian University

Contacts: innalozynska@gmail.com

Webpages:

Danko Yuriy Ivanovych

Doctor of Economics, Professor

Professor of the Department of statistics, business analysis and marketing of the Sumy National Agrarian University

Contacts: y.danko@sau.sumy.ua, yuriy.i.danko@gmail.com

Webpages:

Resume

Under market economy conditions, the development of animal husbandry traditional for Ukraine, maintenance of food independence and filling in the market niche in the sustainable pan-European economic complex directly depend on the state of breeding science development, which is the decisive one in terms of qualitative improvement of species composition. Introduction of domestic and foreign economists’ scientific achievements should be based on the theory of selection and traditional understandings, which have been forming for many years. Therefore, outlining of its further development perspectives is impossible without examination of genesis of certain theories and concepts. Their creative use is an important factor of national animal husbandry revival. Meanwhile, it is worth mentioning the lack of credible theoretical and methodological basis for introduction of organization and economic mechanism of production strategic development, as well as poor empirical basis of institutional research with total substitution of qualitative domestic production with cheap foreign analogues. Under such conditions, the search for the ways to regain the lost positions in animal husbandry production in terms of both science and methodology and practice remains to be urgent and testifies to the objective need for the research of the problem. The paper is devoted to the research of theoretical basis and practical issues of forming and development of animal husbandry strategic directions at agricultural enterprises, taking into account the state programs of production stimulation, which should provide its successful development under current market conditions. The fact that economic and legal aspects of animal husbandry production development are flawed and require significant changes is proven. Taking into account the critical situation in production, the country needs to take all necessary measures to reduce the losses in producers’ activity, to provide the consumer with food, to protect internal market and to produce competitive goods. Strengthening of control over adherence to agricultural legislation, elimination of incoherencies in regulative acts and creation of concessional lending are of urgent importance as well.

Keywords:

animal husbandry, strategy, development, efficiency, state assistance, competitive ability, market

References


1. Borodin, O. D. (2016). Svitovyy dosvid vplyvu derzhavy na rozvytok ekonomiky [World experience of state influence on economic development]. In Visnyk Natsionalʹnoho universytetu tsyvilʹnoho zakhystu Ukrayiny. Seriya «Derzhavne upravlinnya» [Bulletin of the National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine. Series: State Governance]: Vol. 1 (4) (pp. 37-43). () / O. D. Borodin // [in Ukrainian].
2. Borodin, O. D. (2017). Mekhanizmy derzhavnoho rehulyuvannya rozvytku sotsialʹno-kulʹturnoyi sfery [Mechanisms of state regulation of the development of socio-cultural sphere]. (Ph.D. in Pub. Adm. Thesis, National University of Civil Defence of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine). [in Ukrainian].
3. Malimon, V. I. (2011). Kulʹturna polityka derzhavy yak chynnyk reformuvannya suspilʹstva [Cultural policy of the state as a factor in the reform of society]. (Ph.D. in Pub. Adm. Thesis, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine). [in Ukrainian].
4. Fesenko, N. S. (2008). Polityka derzhavy u sferi kulʹtury: implementatsiya zakordonnoho dosvidu na ukrayinsʹki terena [State politics in the sphere of culture: Implementation of foreign experience in Ukrainian areas]. In Derzhavne budivnytstvo [State Building]: Vol. 2. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/DeBu_2008_2_67 [in Ukrainian].
5. Ministry of Culture of Ukraine (2017, Jun 19). Ohlyad kulʹturnoyi polityky Ukrayiny [Review of Ukrainian cultural policy] (Council of Europe expert report). Retrieved from http://195.78.68.75/mcu/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=245330777&cat_id=245328989 [in Ukrainian].