UDC 332.12; JEL O18, O31, R32
Chemerys, V., & Kazmir, L. (2018). Kontseptual'ni zasady stratehuvannya innovatsiynoho rozvytku sil's'kykh terytoriy na rehional'nomu rivni [Conceptual basics of rural areas innovation development strategizing at regional level]. In Sotsial'no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 132 (4) (pp. 79-84). Retrieved from http://ird.gov.ua/sep/doi/sep2018.04.084. [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 28

Authors



Chemerys Vasyl Antonovych

Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor

Senior Researcher of the Department of development of territorial communities and transborder cooperation of the Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine

Contacts: chemerus64@gmail.com

Webpages:

Kazmir Lyubomyr Pavlovych

Ph.D. of Economics

Researcher of the Department of problems of the real sector of regions' economy of the Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine

Contacts: box5@ukr.net

Webpages:

Resume

Solution of the urgent problems of rural areas development in Ukraine under conditions of systemic transformations and the introduction of innovations in the sphere of the rural economy requires significant modernization of the entire system of rural development management. The content, main tasks and functions of innovative development strategizing of rural areas as multifunctional systems are disclosed in the paper. The role of the so-called "school of configuration" (according to Mintzberg), which focuses on the content of strategies, the process of their formation and analysis of the life cycle of the control object, is highlighted. The priority value of strategizing of innovative development in the modern conditions at the regional level is emphasized and the specificity of the institutional design of this type of strategizing is analyzed. The function of synthesis of existing potential and new perspectives of local and regional development and the function of generating qualitatively new resources for diversification of rural development are singled out as the key functions of the strategizing of innovative development of rural areas at the regional level. Special attention is paid to the necessity of coordinating the activities of state authorities, local self-government, scientific and educational institutions, business and public organizations to support measures that promote the activation of innovative processes in the region as a whole, and the feasibility of developing a regional strategy for innovative development. It should stipulate the mandatory allocation of separate block devoted to problems of innovative processes stimulation in the rural areas, in the framework of implementation of the "smart specialization" concept in managerial practice based on the idea of shaping development strategies according to the benefits and potential of a specific region. The authors' suggestions on priority directions of stimulation of innovative development of rural areas in Ukraine at the regional level are submitted.

Keywords:

rural areas, innovative development, strategizing, regional innovation systems, social innovations, smart specialization

References


1. Borodina, O. (2010). Sotsial’ni innovatsiyi v systemi sil’s’koho rozvytku: kontseptual’ni pidkhody [Social innovations in the system of rural development: conceptual approaches]. Ekonomika Ukrayiny – Economy of Ukraine, 9, 68-77. [in Ukrainian].
2. Davymuka, S. A., & Fedulova, L. I. (2018). Teoretyko-metodolohichnyy dyskurs suchasnoho rehional’noho innovatsiynoho rozvytku [Theoretical and Methodological Discourse of Modern Regional Innovation Development]. Rehional’na ekonomika – Regional Economy, 1, 5-16. [in Ukrainian].
3. Zabarna, E. M., & Shchyokina, Ye. Yu. (2016). Stratehuvannya yak instrument sotsial’no-ekonomichnoho rozvytku rehionu [Strategizing as an instrument of socio-economic development of the region]. Modeling of the Regional Economy, 1 (27), 215-225. [in Ukrainian].
4. Klepka, M., Matusiak, K., & Zasiadly, K. (Eds.) (2005). Instrumenty pidtrymky innovatsiynosti malykh i serednikh pidpryyemstv: dosvid Pol’shchi ta Yevropeys’koho Soyuzu [Tools for innovating support for small and medyum-sized enterprises: the experience of Poland and the European Union]. Poznan; Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
5. Kazmir, P. H., Stupen, M. H., & Kazmir, L. P. (2011). Kontseptual’ni zasady modernizatsiyi systemy upravlinnya rozvytkom sil’s’kykh terytoriy [Conceptual bases of modernization of the management system for the development of rural areas]. In Sotsial’no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 92(6). Suchasni problemy rozvytku sil’s’kykh terytoriy [Modern problems of development of rural areas] (pp. 81-90). [in Ukrainian].
6. Konstantinidi, C. A. (2015). Strategirovaniye razvitiya regional’noy ekonomicheskoy sistemy v usloviyakh uskoreniya postindustrial’nykh preobrazovaniy [Strategizing the development of a regional economic system in the context of accelerating post-industrial transformations]. Moscow: Sputnik. [in Russian].
7. Kukharskaya, N. A. (2012). Ideologiya strategirovaniya sotsio-ekologo-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regiona [Ideology of the strategizing of the socio-ecological-economic development of the region]. In Ekonomichni innovatsiyi. Potentsial pidpryyemstva v paradyhmi staloho rozvytku rehioniv Ukrayiny [Economical Innovations. Potential of the company in the paradigm of sustainable development of the regions of Ukraine]: Vol. 51 (pp. 243-244). Odessa. [in Russian].
8. Kukharskaya, N. A. (2014). Strategirovaniye sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya regiona kak novyy podkhod k razrabotke i realizatsii strategiy regional’nogo razvitiya [Strategizing the socio-economic development of the region as a new approach to the development and implementation of regional development strategies]. In Sotsial’no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 107(3). Rehional’na polityka v Ukrayini: suchasnyy stan ta shlyakhy aktyvizatsiyi [Regional policy in Ukraine: current situation and ways of activation] (pp. 22-28). [in Ukrainian].
9. Mintzberg, H. (2008). Zlit i padinnya stratehichnoho planuvannya [The rise and the fall of strategic planning]. Kyiv. [in Ukrainian].
10. Myasnikova, T. A. (2014). Strategirovaniye sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya munitsipal’nykh obrazovaniy: teoriya i praktika rossiyskikh regionov [Strategizing the socio-economic development of municipalities: theory and practice of Russian regions]. Voronezh: Scientific Book. [in Russian].
11. Obzor innovatsionnogo razvitiya. Ukraina [Review of innovative development. Ukraine] (2013). New York; Geneva: UNECE. [in Russian].
12. Smorodinskaya, N. (2011). Troynaya spiral’ kak novaya matritsa ekonomicheskikh sistem [The triple helix as a new matrix of economic systems]. Innovatsii – Innovation, 4, 66-78. [in Russian].
13. Borshchevskyy, V. V., & Vasyltsiv, T. H. (Eds.) (2014). Stratehichni priorytety ta mekhanizmy innovatsiynoho rozvytku sil’s’kykh terytoriy Zakhidnoho rehionu Ukrayiny [Strategic priorities and mechanisms of innovative development of rural areas of the Western region of Ukraine]. Lviv: Avers. [in Ukrainian].
14. Fedulova, L. I. (2009). Orhanizatsiyni mekhanizmy formuvannya rezul’tatyvnoyi rehional’noyi innovatsiynoyi systemy [Organizational mechanisms for the formation of a productive regional innovation system]. In Stratehichni priorytety [Strategic Priorities]: Vol. 4 (pp. 157-165). [in Ukrainian].
15. Chemerys, V. A. (2013). Prohramno-proektnyy pidkhid stratehichnoho rozvytku sil’s’kykh terytoriy rehionu [Program-project approach of strategic development of rural areas of the region]. In Naukovyy visnyk NLTU Ukrayiny [Scientific Bulletin of National Forestry University of Ukraine]: Vol. 23 (pp. 332-338). [in Ukrainian].
16. Lamine, C., Renting, H., Rossi, A., Wiskerke, J. S.C., & Brunori, G. (2012). Agri-Food systems and territorial development: innovations: new dynamics and changing governance mechanisms. In Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic (pp. 229-256). Dordrecht: Springer.
17. Carayannis, E., & Grigoroudis, E. (2016). Quadruple innovation helix and smart specialization: knowledge production and national competitiveness. Foresight and STI Governance, 10(1), 31-42.
18. Chen, J., & Yang, Y. (2012). Theoretical basis and content for collaborative innovation. Studies in Science of Science, 2, 161-164.
19. Drabenstott, M., & Henderson, J. (2006). A new rural economy: A new role for public policy. Management Quarterly, 47(4), 4-18.
20. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social science information, 42(3), 293-337.
21. Henderson, D. (2000). EU Regional Innovation Strategies: regional experimentalism in practice. European Urban and Regional Studies, 7(4), 347-358.
22. Mintzberg, H., & Lampel, J. (1999). Reflecting on the strategy process. Sloan management review, 40, 21-30.
23. Smart specialization and Europe’s growth agenda (2014). Brussels: European Commission.
24. The New Rural Paradigm: Policies and Governance (2006). OECD Rural Policy Reviews. Paris.
25. Brunori, G., Knickel, K., Rand, S., & Proost, J. (2009). Towards a better conceptual framework for innovation processes in agriculture and rural development: From linear models to systemic approaches. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 15, 131-145.
26. Roth, M., Nobis, R., Stetsyuk, V., & Kruhlov, I. (Eds.) (2008). Transformation processes in the Western Ukraine: concepts for a sustainable land use. Berlin: Weißensee-Verlag.
27. Weigl, T. (2008). Strategy, Structure and Performance in Transition Economy. An Institutional Perspective on Configurations in Russia. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.
28. Williamson, O. E. (1991). Strategizing, Economizing, and Economic Organization. Strategic Management Journal, 12 (Special Issue), 75-94.