UDC 364.122.5:005; JEL R22, C44
Lуsyak, N. (2020). Obgruntuvannya metodyky analizu stanu urbanizovanykh system [Methodical approaches to the analysis of the state of urbanized systems]. In Sotsial'no-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny [Socio-Economic Problems of the Modern Period of Ukraine]: Vol. 144 (4) (pp. 18-26). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36818/2071-4653-2020-4-3. [in Ukrainian].
Sources: 9

Authors



Lysyak Natalya Mykhaylivna

Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor

Researcher of the Department of regional economic policy of the Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine; Professor of the Department of economics and marketing of the Academic institute of entrepreneurship and advanced technologies of the Lviv Polytechnic National University

Contacts: natali.bila@gmail.com

Webpages:

Resume

The methodological bases of the analysis of the condition of urbanized systems are substantiated in the article by means of methods of system analysis. Based on the model of the urban system, the available methods of research of the development of urban systems are singled out and characterized. The system of methods used to study urban systems includes methods of economic, social, spatial analysis, universal methods. For today's conditions, general scientific and special methods, which include economic and mathematical methods, methods of statistical analysis, and factor analysis, have remained relevant and suitable for solving socio-economic problems. Well-known and widely used methods of spatial analysis and synthesis will remain relevant, in particular, population forecasting and determining the demographic capacity of the territory; factor-by-factor analysis and comprehensive assessment of the territory; calculation of traffic flows and transport capacity in the territory and in cities; minimization of territorial ties; assessments of urban systems; location of service facilities, delineation of their radii of accessibility, etc. A separate group includes universal research methods suitable for the study of all dimensions of the system. Using a systems approach, our own method of analyzing the state of urban systems is substantiated. The method of analysis of the state of the urban system is based on four components of the system: human, spatial, social, and temporal. The economic component is a priority. Quantitative and qualitative relationships between economic and spatial, social, and temporal characteristics of the system are revealed. The combination of dimensions forms a set of combinations for the analysis of the economy of the urban system, in particular, there are socio-economic, spatial-economic, economic-temporal, and socio-spatial sections. Characteristics of individual dimensions and their interaction allow to organize information about the state of the system, to determine the tasks of the socio-economic and spatial development of cities, to reveal the possibilities of their system analysis.

Keywords:

methodology, research methods, system approach, urbanized system

References


1. Habrel, M. M. (2004). Prostorova orhanizatsiya mistobudivnykh system [Spatial organization of urban systems]. K.: Publishing house A.S.S.. [in Ukrainian].
2. Dolishniy, M. I., Shevchuk, L. T., & Shevchuk, Ya. V. (2004). Terytorial’na suspil’na systema yak ob»yekt doslidzhennya rehional’noyi ekonomiky Ukrayiny [Territorial social system as an object of study of the regional economy of Ukraine]. In Sotsial’no-ekonomichni doslidzhennya v perekhidnyy period [Socio-economic research in transition]: Vol. З:1. Rehional’ni suspil’ni systemy [Regional social systems] (pp. 3-14). [in Ukrainian].
3. Ibatullin, Sh. I., & Stepanko, O. V. (2013). Teoretyko-metodolohichni osnovy formuvannya pryrodno-hospodars’kykh terytorial’nykh system v Ukrayini [Theoretical and methodological bases of formation of natural and economic territorial systems in Ukraine]. Investytsiyi: praktyka ta dosvid – Investments: practice and experience, 19, 6-10. [in Ukrainian].
4. Ositnyanko, A. P., & Mamedov, A. M. (1998). Problemy upravlinnya terytorial’nym rozvytkom mista [Problems of territorial development management of the city]. In Mistobuduvannya ta terytorial’ne planuvannya [Urban planning and spatial planning]: Vol. 2 (pp. 56-62). [in Ukrainian].
5. Nyemets, K. A., & Nyemets, L. M. (2014). Teoriya i metodolohiya heohrafichnoyi nauky: metody prostorovoho analizu [Theory and methodology of geographical science: methods of spatial analysis]: Educational and methodical manual. Kharkiv: V. N. Karazin KhNU. [in Ukrainian].
6. Oleksyuk, H. V., Lysyak, N. M., & Popadynets, N. M. (2019). Kontseptual’no-strukturni modeli endohennoho potentsialu ob»yednanykh terytorial’nykh hromad yak peredumova pidvyshchennya yikh konkurentospromozhnosti [Conceptual and structural models of endogenous potential of united territorial communities as a prerequisite for increasing their competitiveness]. Ekonomika Ukrayiny – Ukraine economy, 3, 52-69. [in Ukrainian].
7. Oleksyuk, H. V., Popadynets, N. M., & Lysyak, N. M. (2020). Kontseptual’na finansovo-ekonomichna model’ urbanizovanykh system [Conceptual financial and economic model of urban systems]. Ekonomika ta pravo – Economics and law, 2, 84-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/econlaw.2020.02.084 [in Ukrainian].
8. Sosnovskiy, V. A., & Rusakova, N. S. (2006). Prikladnyye metody gradostroitel’nykh issledovaniy [Applied methods of urban planning research]: Tutorial. M.: Architecture-S. [in Russian].
9. Klyushnychenko, Ye. Ye. (1999). Sotsial’no-ekonomichni osnovy planuvannya ta zabudovy mist [Socio-economic bases of urban planning and development]. K.: Ukrainian Academy of Architecture, Research Design Institute of Urban Planning. [in Ukrainian].