Scientific and practical journal
УКР   ENG
Regional Economy
   



Journal Regional Economy -- re2017.02.031

UDC 338.242:336:[338.46:378]; JEL I28, O15
Kuzmin, O. Ye. & , Yastrubskyy, M. Ya. (2017). Chynnyky zabezpechennya yakosti derzhavnoho upravlinnya osvityans'koyu diyal'nistyu VNZ [Factors of providing the quality of public administration of educational activity in higher education]. Rehional'na ekonomika - Regional Economy, 84(2), 31-38. [in Ukrainian].

Authors



Kuzmin Oleh Yevhenovych

Doctor of Economics, Professor

Head of Department, Director of the Department of management and international business of the Institute of Economics and Management of the Lviv Polytechnic National University

Contacts: oleh.y.kuzmin@lpnu.ua, okuzmin@lp.edu.ua

Webpages:



Yastrubskyy Mykhaylo Yaroslavovych

Ph.D. of Economics, Associate Professor

Associate Professor of the Department of accounting and analysis of the Lviv Polytechnic National University

Contacts: oalp@ukr.net

Webpages:

Resume

The article investigates the factors that ensure the quality of governance of educational activities in higher education. It is grounded that there are objective reasons why higher education requires constant updates and changes, the effectiveness of which depends on the national education policy and governance.
Domestic and foreign researchers highlighted some aspects of public administration in high schools, but did not go deep with causation and did not introduce their fundamental understanding.
The motivation for conducting this study lies in the need to systematize and classify the factors that can ensure good governance of educational activities in higher education.
The paper provides literature review on clustering and systematizing the factors highlighted in different approaches, which have been developed by scientists. The list of tasks set by the authors includes elaboration of an approach to solving the problem.
The article reviews the main systems of high school’s management, including national, represented as a list of factors that are manifested in the quality characteristics of public administration of educational activities.
Classification scheme to systematize factors that ensure the quality of governance educational activities in higher education based on domestic and foreign experience is offered in the article.
The article describes the main characteristics of educational policies that are typical for some countries because of different levels of economic development. It can be evidenced through government regulations. The article describes the main challenges facing higher education.
The proposed systematized factors are observed taking into account their interrelation and thus they can provide the expected effect in case of optimal combination and skillful use. Effective use of factors in state regulation is evidenced by the implementation of motivational factors. Factors of government regulation are in close relationship with environmental factors. The authors conclude that there is need to change the approach to management of high schools’ educational activities, taking into account factors of social development.
The proposed systematization of factors, which ensure the good governance of high schools’ educational activities, has been designed by the authors based on the study of positive domestic and foreign experience. When building the optimal model of public administration of educational activities in higher schools the updated classification of factors should be taken into account.

Keywords:

factors, public administration, higher education, educational activities, education quality, relevance, experience, classification

References

    
  1. Supreme Council of Ukraine (2014). Pro vyshchu osvitu [About Higher Education]: Law of Ukraine, adopted on 2014, July 1, 1556-VII. Retrieved from http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1556-18 [in Ukrainian].
  2. Didyk, A. M. (2016). Polivektornyy rozvytok pidpryyemstv: sotsialʹno-ekonomichni ta rehulyatyvni aspekty [Polyvector development of enterprises: socio-economic and regulatory aspects]. Lviv: Galych Publishing Union. [in Ukrainian].
  3. Kolodiy, I. S. (2014). Kurs lektsiy do navchalʹnoyi dystsypliny «Derzhavna osvitnya polityka» dlya studentiv spetsialʹnosti 8.18010020 «Upravlinnya navchalʹnym zakladom» [Course of lectures to the academic discipline "State educational policy" for students of the specialty 8.18010020 "Management of the educational institution"]. Lviv: Publishing House of Lviv Polytechnic. [in Ukrainian].
  4. Higher Education Law of the Peopleʺs Republic of China (1998, August 29). Retrieved from http://www.moe.edu.cn.html
  5. Teachers Law of the People’s Republic of China (1993, October 31). Retrieved from http://www.moe.edu.cn/publicfiles.html
  6. Hala, S. V. (2011). Iz dosvidu reformuvannya vyshchoyi osvity Kytayu [From the experience of reforming the higher education of China]. Ekonomika ta derzhava – Economy and State, 82, 52-54. [in Ukrainian].
  7. Shorobura, I. M., Dolynskyy, Ye. V., & Dolynska, O. O. (2015). Menedzhment vyshchoyi osvity [Management of higher education]. Khmelnytsky: Khmelnytsky Humanitarian Pedagogical Academy. [in Ukrainian].
  8. Education in China (2017). Retrieved from https://www.unipage.net/en/education_in_china
  9. Hryshchenko, I. M. (Ed.) (2010). Ekonomichni aspekty problem rozvytku vyshchoyi osvity v Ukrayini [Economic aspects of the problems of the development of higher education in Ukraine]. Khmelnytsky: Khmelnytsky National University. [in Ukrainian].
  10. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2016). Osnovni pokaznyky diyalʹnosti vyshchykh navchalʹnykh zakladiv Ukrayiny na pochatok 2016/17 navchalʹnoho roku [Main indicators of activity of higher educational institutions of Ukraine at the beginning of 2016/17 academic year]. Kyiv. Retrieved from https://ukrstat.org/uk/druk/publicat/Arhiv_u/15/Arch_vnz_bl.htm [in Ukrainian].
  11. Terovanesov, M. R. (2014). Optymizatsiya upravlinnya systemoyu vyshchoyi osvity [Optimization of management of the system of higher education]. In Naukovyy visnyk Khersons’koho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriya: Ekonomichni nauky [Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series: Economics]: Vol. 9(2) (pp. 83-87). [in Ukrainian].
  12. Batechko, N. H. (2012). Derzhavne upravlinnya sferoyu vyshchoyi osvity Ukrayiny: superechnosti suchasnoho rozvytku [State governance in the sphere of higher education of Ukraine: contradictions of modern development]. Naukovi pratsi Chornomors’koho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Petra Mohyly kompleksu "Kyyevo-Mohylyans’ka akademiya". Seriya: Pedahohika – Scientific papers of Petro Mohyla Black Sea State University of the complex "Kyiv-Mohyla Academy". Series: Economics, 209(197), 10-15. [in Ukrainian].
  13. Kuzmin, O. Ye., Yastrubskyy, M. Ya. (2017). Priorytetni napryamky finansuvannya VNZ: osoblyvosti vplyvu kontynhentu inozemnykh studentiv na rezulʹtatyvnistʹ diyalʹnosti reformuvannya [Priority areas of financing of universities: features of the influence of contingent of foreign students on the effectiveness of reforming activities]. In Visnyk Natsional’noho universytetu «L’vivs’ka politekhnika». Seriya «Problemy ekonomiky ta upravlinnya» [Bulletin of National University «Lviv Polytechnic». Series «Problems of economy and management»]: Vol. 862 (pp. 139-144). [in Ukrainian].
  14. Hala, S. V. (2012). Funktsionuvannya systemy vyshchoyi osvity Kytayu: analiz dosvidu [The functioning of the system of higher education in China: An analysis of the experience]. Aktual’ni problemy ekonomiky – Actual Problems of Economics, 9, 72-77. [in Ukrainian].
  15. 18 faktov ob obrazovanyy v Kytae [18 facts about education in China] (2012, April 25). Retrieved from http://www.kraskizhizni.com/edu/teach/563-obrazovanie-v-kitae
  16. President of Ukraine (2002). Pro Natsionalʹnu doktrynu rozvytku osvity [On the National Doctrine of Education Development]. Presidential Decree on 2002, April 17, 347. Retrieved from http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/347/2002 [in Ukrainian].

Similar papers



Repository of Institute of Regional Research UDC [338.46:37]:330.34; JEL I28, O15
Zahorskyy, V. S. (2017). Osvita yak vyznachal'nyy faktor zabezpechennya staloho rozvytku natsional'noyi ekonomiky [Education as a decisive factor in ensuring sustainable development of the national economy]. Rehional'na ekonomika - Regional Economy, 84(2), 23-30. [in Ukrainian].

Sources: 6


The problem of human and social capital formation is closely connected to the functioning of the education system. From the standpoint of a system approach, education is a functional institution of a society, which has its own structure and specific aim of functioning. The complication of social and manufacturing, information and intellectual relations in the processes of civilization development generates increased requirements for the functioning of social and industrial subsystems, which can be solved only by means of education.
The functioning of the education system is not just the transfer of knowledge and the development of a person, but also the intellectual support of socio-economic development. Educational functions play a key role in the pace of civilization progress in the nearest future. In the context of sustainable development, an important moment in the role of education is that knowledge has the ability to grow and deepen. As a result, education carries out the transfer of knowledge to the next generation, which provides for a progressive development of future generations. Today, education is seen as a continuous process that lasts throughout life and is characterized not only by the replenishment of the information stock, but by the change in its structure and forms in accordance with the new requirements.
From the point of view of economic development, education is the source of creating new opportunities and resources for development that significantly changes the quality of human life, ensures the achievement of harmony of natural, social and spiritual human nature. Knowledge and information allow achieving the set goals, minimizing the resources, convincing people of their personal interest for these purposes. According to some estimates, today in the world about 70% of gross domestic product (GDP) growth is due to the application of new knowledge embodied in innovative production and management technologies.
Knowledge as a special resource of social development has the properties of continuous reproduction and accumulation. However, like any resource, knowledge is prone to destruction, impoverishment and, moreover, unlike natural resources, the usefulness of which is beyond doubt, the usefulness of knowledge may be questionable. This happens when knowledge (in the context of education problems) is considered and analyzed as a narrow category that involves only professionalism, in isolation from the morality of the subject (individual or organization) – the bearer of knowledge.
Today the rates of obsolescence of knowledge grow; the life cycle of goods (services) is reduced. Companies gain advantages in a competitive struggle by creating strategies that focus not on predicting and analyzing the external environment, but, above all, on the efficient increasing and using of their own resources, primarily intellectual ones. It is obvious that intellectual activity cannot be performed without fundamental knowledge, i.e. the knowledge necessary for the education of a graduate of an educational institution, which allows forming a valuable-meaningful system for orienting a person in the flows of information. 
education, knowledge, human capital, resource, development, economics 


Web Master P. Popadiuk