The restoration of industry in post-war Ukraine is possible only if the direction of its development corresponds to the current trend of development of the world economy, namely the militarization of the world economy. Thus, the criterion for the success of the Ukrainian economy can be the level of post-war development of industry that produces military equipment and weapons, and these products must be high-tech, such that it has a closed production cycle within the country. So, the urgent task is to find ways to restore and develop the production of semiconductor materials, discrete devices and integrated circuits directly in Ukraine for the manufacture of high-tech military equipment, both for own needs and for export, including in the United States. The main negative trend of the modern and in the recent past historical and economic trend of Ukraine's development is the deindustrialization of its economy, namely the structural inconsistency with modern technological development. The crisis of neoliberal globalization has led not only to the development of deindustrialization trends in developing countries (to which Ukraine belongs), but also to the reduction of the industrial sector in highly developed countries. In Ukraine, the domestic electronic industry is in a deep structural and technological crisis. But in Ukraine, historically, the electronic industry has provided orders mainly for the defense-industrial complex for the development and manufacture of highly intelligent and high-tech electronic products for military or dual use. In the near future, this trend in the development of the industry will fully recover. The motivation for this is the need for the most effective defence technologies and products, and the driver is global defence spending. It is reasonable to plan the recovery and development of Ukraine's semiconductor industry in the context of changes in the world economy and the global microelectronics market, whose products are a strategic component of the military, economic and industrial base of superpowers and therefore are at the center of conflicting geostrategic interests and at the heart of the global technological race, which will be accompanied by partial deglobalization. Thus, Ukraine has no choice but to resume independent production of electron component base (ECB) for military equipment and weapons. The purpose of this work is a preliminary brief consideration of the fundamental possibility and feasibility of using SiGe as a semiconductor material for the manufacture of microelectronics and dual-use power devices. In Ukraine, an industrial technology for growing single-crystal SiGe has been developed, which allows us to talk about the possibility of its export. In fact, it is necessary to solve a scientific, technical and / or technological problem, which allows us to offer potential customers a product with unique (or at least not widespread) properties and reasonable prices. The possibility of entering the world markets of semiconductor technology, first of all, from a physical and technological point of view, is quite real and should be considered during further research.
the trend of the development of the world economy, the recovery and development of the semiconductor industry of Ukraine, the choice of semiconductor material, the manufacture of microelectronics and dual-use power devices
The analysis of the definition of the concept "social security of the territorial community" shows that there is no its normative definition in Ukraine. Authors outlined the social security of the territorial community as its state, which ensures the protection of vital interests of the territorial community and its effective functioning and sustainable development. The basic requirements for the provision of social security rights are set out in the International Covenant on Social, Economic and Cultural Rights, the European Social Charter (revised), the Constitution of Ukraine, the relevant internal social standards, the Statutes of the territorial communities. However, today's social security systems are largely aimed at guaranteeing a certain level of quality of life, but do not take into account the behavioral component of the territorial community as a social system, the priorities of sustainable development, and therefore require additional study and improvement. Social security is a component of national, economic security. An analysis of changes in the legislation and regulatory framework of Ukraine during the last years testifies that the social component of national security in legislation is somewhat offset. The Resolution of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine "On the Concept (Fundamentals of State Policy) of National Security of Ukraine", the Law of Ukraine "On Fundamentals of National Security of Ukraine" (which are invalid nowadays) positioned the social doctrine as an integral part of the state national security policy. The Law of Ukraine "On National Security of Ukraine" does not explicitly provide for the obligatory social component of the state national security and defense policy, nor does it necessitate the development of an appropriate strategy (doctrine) of social security. Understanding of social security of a territorial community exclusively as the protection of social rights and freedoms of its members is limited and requires a wider interpretation taking into account the subject-object status of a territorial community in the system of socio-economic relations.
social security of territorial communities, resources, regional policy, national security, criteria
Citations
Varnaliy, Z. S., Mokiy, A. I., & et al. (2005). Rehiony Ukrayiny: problemy ta priorytety sotsial’noekonomichnoho rozvytku [Regions of Ukraine: Problems and priorities of socio-economic development]. Kyiv: Knowledge of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian]. {sep2017.06.029.001}
Mokiy, A. I., & Datsko, O. I. (2015). Terytorial’na hromada v systemi ekonomichnoyi bezpeky [Territorial community in the system of economic security of the state]. In Stratehichni priorytety [Strategic priorities]: Vol 1 (pp. 83-89). Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/spa_2015_1_14 [in Ukrainian]. {sep2018.06.042.018}
Mokiy, A. I., & Datsko, O. I. (2014). Rozvytok sotsial’noho pidpryyemnytstva u konteksti zmitsnennya ekonomichnoyi bezpeky depresyvnykh terytoriy [Development of social entrepreneurship in the context of strengthening the economic security of depressed areas]. Visnyk Chernivets’koho torhovel’no-ekonomichnoho instytutu – Bulletin fra Chernivtsi Trade and Economic Institute, 1(53), 155-166. [in Ukrainian]. {sep2022.03.010.010}
Mokiy, A. I. (Ed.) (2019). Konkurentni stratehiyi bezpeky rozvytku Ukrayiny u hlobal'nomu seredovyshchi [Competitive strategies for the security of Ukraine’s development in the global environment]. Lviv: Dolishniy Institute of Regional Research of NAS of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian]. {sep2022.06.003.003}